As a psy­chi­a­trist in the Wayne Unit of Texas’ Huntsville prison from 1960 to 1963, Dr. Lee Hartman presided over 14 elec­tric-chair exe­cu­tions. When his grand­son, Ben Hartman, a jour­nal­ist, began inves­ti­gat­ing Dr. Hartman’s life, he dis­cov­ered jour­nals that chron­i­cle those exe­cu­tions and the psy­cho­log­i­cal toll they took, pos­si­bly con­tribut­ing to Dr. Hartman’s sui­cide in 1964. Dr. Hartman’s jour­nals con­tain basic data on the men who were exe­cut­ed, includ­ing their names, race, a sum­ma­ry of the crime, and notes on the exe­cu­tion itself. More pro­found­ly, though, they cap­ture Dr. Hartman’s reac­tions to his expe­ri­ences and how they shaped his views on the death penal­ty, leav­ing him — in his grand­son’s words — a deter­mined oppo­nent of cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment.” In 1962, Dr. Hartman wrote, The death penal­ty is irrepara­ble.” After the high­ly-pub­li­cized exe­cu­tion of Howard Stickney, a 24-year old who pro­fessed his inno­cence, Dr. Hartman wrote, Very shook up and angry over whole cru­el mess.” He had been with Stickney on his sched­uled November 10, 1961 exe­cu­tion date as they neared the door to the exe­cu­tion cham­ber. The jour­nal reports that the phone rang at 12:32 a.m. with news that a judge had grant­ed a 10-day stay of exe­cu­tion. This was “[a]pparently a com­plete sur­prise to Stickney,” the jour­nal entry says, who broke down, prayed and wept.” In May of 1962, still pro­fess­ing his inno­cence, Stickney exhib­it­ed “[d]ignity and grace, shook hands with sev­er­al guards while wait­ing, didn’t want to take coat off.” The jour­nal reports: At 12:24, war­den returned – no stay, Stickney qui­et­ly sat in chair.” Three sep­a­rate jolts of elec­tric cur­rent were sent through his body, 1st shock at 12:25 – dead at 12:30.” Elsewhere in the jour­nal, Dr. Hartman wrote 19 pages on argu­ments for and against cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment, clear­ly set­ting out his views. The death penal­ty has a bru­tal­iz­ing and sadis­tic influ­ence on the com­mu­ni­ty that delib­er­ate­ly kills a mem­ber of its group,” he wrote, per­mit­ting the pub­lic to vic­ar­i­ous­ly indulge in vicious and inhu­mane fan­tasies under social­ly-accept­able guis­es.” He wrote: The death penal­ty is not applied impar­tial­ly. There is such sur­feit of these cas­es that to men­tion them would be redun­dant. The poor defen­dant is obvi­ous­ly at a dis­ad­van­tage and fre­quent­ly receives the extreme penal­ty while the wealth­i­er accused escapes a prison term. There is well known dis­crim­i­na­tion on racial or class lines.” Dr. Hartman strug­gled with depres­sion for many years, spend­ing sev­er­al months in a men­tal hos­pi­tal after work­ing in the prison. In 1964, he com­mit­ted sui­cide by tak­ing an over­dose of pen­to­bar­bi­tal, a drug now used to exe­cute pris­on­ers in Texas.

(B. Hartman, My grand­fa­ther was a death row doc­tor. He test­ed psy­che­del­ic drugs on Texas inmates.,” The Texas Tribune, July 5, 2017.) See New Voices and History of the Death Penalty.

Citation Guide