On February 22, Virginia’s leg­is­la­ture blocked a bill that would have allowed the death penal­ty for accom­plices to mur­der who did not actu­al­ly car­ry out the killing. The bill would have revised the state’s trig­ger­man rule,” which allows the death penal­ty only for the per­son direct­ly respon­si­ble for the actu­al mur­der. Two weeks ago, the Senate ver­sion of the bill was reject­ed by the Courts of Justice Committee on a 7 – 7 vote. The House then passed its own ver­sion of the bill, forc­ing the Senate to recon­sid­er the mea­sure. The Courts Committee again reject­ed the expan­sion bill, this time by a vote of 8 – 6. The vote dif­fer­ence was attrib­uted to Republican Senator Bryce Reeves, who said he changed his vote based on his reli­gious beliefs. Similar bills were passed by the Virginia leg­is­la­ture in 2008 and 2009, but were vetoed by then-Governor Tim Kaine. In 2010 and 2011, the Senate Courts Committee reject­ed sim­i­lar bills. Stephen Northup, exec­u­tive direc­tor of Virginians for Alternatives to the Death Penalty, called the bill an unnec­es­sary[,] expen­sive and risky expan­sion of cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment.” Among those oppos­ing the bill were rep­re­sen­ta­tives of Catholic orga­ni­za­tions, the American Civil Liberties Union, and Attorney General Kenneth Cuccinelli. Some of these not­ed that the state already ranks sec­ond to Texas in the num­ber of exe­cu­tions since the the death penal­ty was rein­stat­ed in 1976, and that expand­ing death penal­ty eli­gi­bil­i­ty would increase the chances of exe­cut­ing an innocent person.

(L. O’Dell, Triggerman bill killed by Senate pan­el,” Associated Press, February 23, 2012). See Recent Legislative Activity and Crimes Punishable by the Death Penalty.

Citation Guide