In the wake of a U.S. Supreme Court deci­sion strik­ing down Floridas death-sen­tenc­ing pro­ce­dures, a new poll shows that near­ly two thirds of Floridians now pre­fer some form of life sen­tence to the death penal­ty and near­ly three-quar­ters favor requir­ing the jury to unan­i­mous­ly agree on the sen­tence before the death penal­ty can be imposed. The poll by Public Policy Polling found that 62% of respon­dents pre­ferred some form of life in prison over the death penal­ty for con­vict­ed mur­der­ers, while 35% pre­ferred the death penal­ty. A plu­ral­i­ty (38%) pre­ferred life with­out parole cou­pled with resti­tu­tion pay­ments, while an addi­tion­al 24% pre­ferred either life with­out parole or life with parole eli­gi­bil­i­ty after 40 years. The poll comes short­ly after the Supreme Court declared Florida’s sen­tenc­ing scheme uncon­sti­tu­tion­al in Hurst v. Florida because it per­mit­ted judges, rather than juries, to deter­mine whether the pros­e­cu­tion had proven fac­tors that make a defen­dant eli­gi­ble for the death penal­ty. It left open a sec­ond ques­tion as to whether jury rec­om­men­da­tions for death had to be unan­i­mous. As the Florida leg­is­la­ture con­sid­ers its response to Hurst, the poll showed broad sup­port across the polit­i­cal spec­trum for requir­ing jury una­nim­i­ty in sen­tenc­ing. Overall, 73% of Floridians sup­port­ed a una­nim­i­ty require­ment, includ­ing 70% of Republicans and Independents and 77% of Democrats. A Tampa Bay Times inves­ti­ga­tion this week raised ques­tions as to the reli­a­bil­i­ty of non-unan­i­mous death sen­tences. The paper report­ed that death sen­tences imposed after non-unan­i­mous jury rec­om­men­da­tions were far more like­ly to be over­turned and posed seri­ous risks to the inno­cent. 18 of the 20 Florida exon­er­a­tions for which jury data was avail­able (90%) involved non-unan­i­mous jury rec­om­men­da­tions, includ­ing 3 cas­es in which judges over­rode jury rec­om­men­da­tions for life sen­tences. Stephen Harper of the Florida Center for Capital Representation at Florida International University College of Law, respond­ed to the polling results, say­ing, The state leg­is­la­ture should fol­low Floridians’ lead and sup­port a unan­i­mous jury require­ment in cap­i­tal cas­es. Failing to do so will leave Florida’s death penal­ty statute vul­ner­a­ble to addi­tion­al costly litigation.”

The Florida State Senate Criminal Justice Committee has approved a bill requir­ing jury una­nim­i­ty. A bill cur­rent­ly in the State House would per­mit a judge to impose a death sen­tence if nine or more jurors rec­om­mend­ed death. (A. Phillips, How the nation’s low­est bar for the death penal­ty has shaped death row,” Tampa Bay Times, January 31, 2016; Public Policy Polling, Florida Survey Results,” February 8, 2016; S. Bousquet, Senate pan­el OKs death penal­ty fix; requires unan­i­mous juries,” Tampa Bay Times, February 8, 2016; Press Release, Stephen Harper, February 8, 2016.) See Public Opinion.

Citation Guide