Missouri Supreme Court Blocks Marcellus Williams from Entering Plea to Avoid Execution After State Reveals Mishandled Evidence

On August 21, 2024, Marcellus Williams (pictured), who is scheduled to be executed on September 24, 2024, agreed to enter an Alford plea in exchange for a sentence of life without parole. This agreement would have ensured that Mr. Williams, who has always maintained his innocence in the 1998 murder of Felicia Gayle, would not be executed. But hours after Judge Bruce F. Hilton accepted the plea agreement, Attorney General Andrew Bailey asked the Missouri Supreme Court to block the deal, claiming that Judge Hilton did not have the authority to resentence Mr. Williams. In response, the Missouri Supreme Court ordered the lower court to set aside the plea agreement and move forward with the scheduled evidentiary hearing. Judge Hilton has now rescheduled it for August 28, 2024.

In January 2024, Prosecuting Attorney Wesley Bell filed a motion to vacate Mr. Williams’ death sentence after DNA testing excluded him as the source of DNA on the murder weapon. A 2021 Missouri law allows prosecutors to challenge past convictions if they believe the individual is innocent or wrongfully convicted. Including Mr. Williams’ case, this law has been used six times, with varying degrees of success. AG Bailey has consistently opposed any effort by Mr. Williams to appeal his conviction and death sentence. The Missouri Attorney General’s office has a decades-long history of opposing relief in other innocence cases as well. In 2021 and 2023, respectively, Kevin Strickland and Lamar Johnson were exonerated despite the AG’s efforts to prevent their release. 

Mr. Williams’ plea agreement was reached as both parties were scheduled to begin an evidentiary hearing on DA Bell’s motion to vacate Mr. Williams’ conviction and death sentence. In connection with the announcement of the plea deal, however, prosecutors unexpectedly announced that the murder weapon contained the DNA of members of the trial prosecution team. Consistent with his assertion of innocence, the murder weapon does not show any DNA from Mr. Williams, but now confirms that the crime scene evidence was mishandled by prosecutors. No physical or forensic evidence has ever connected Mr. Williams to the crime scene. 

A new analysis of the murder weapon found that DNA present was consistent with that of an investigator and a prosecutor involved in the original trial. Matthew Jacober, with Mr. Bell’s office, told the court that the newly revealed DNA evidence, which was instrumental to Mr. Bell’s motion to vacate, “did not fully support our initial conclusions.” Mr. Jacober told the court that Mr. Bell’s office “deeply regrets its failure” to properly preserve the evidence.

Representatives of Mr. Bell’s office determined that the new DNA findings weakened Mr. Williams’ innocence claim, though the case has many other serious errors. His office proposed that Mr. Williams enter an Alfordplea, which would have permitted Mr. Williams to maintain his innocence and avoid execution. After speaking with Daniel Picus, Ms. Gayle’s husband, who is opposed to executing Mr. Williams, Judge Hilton determined that the plea agreement is “a proper remedy” to the case. AG Bailey disagreement with this ruling resulted in the Missouri Supreme Court’s order resetting the evidentiary hearing. The lower court may seek a stay of execution for Mr. Williams while the lower court proceedings continue.