The Problem of False Confessions in a Post-DNA World,” a recent study pub­lished in the North Carolina Law Review, found that juve­nile offend­ers were involved in 33% of the cas­es where the defen­dant con­fessed to a crime that he or she did not com­mit. Ninety-two per­cent of the cas­es involved false con­fes­sions from indi­vid­u­als under the age of 40, and more than half were under the age of 25. According to the study’s authors, law pro­fes­sors Richard Leo of the University of California at Irvine and Steve Drizin, of Northwestern University, this find­ing sug­gests that those under the age of 18 are more vul­ner­a­ble to police pres­sure dur­ing inter­ro­ga­tion.” The study exam­ined the largest group of proven false con­fes­sions involv­ing seri­ous felonies ever col­lect­ed, many of which were recent­ly con­firmed and uncov­ered through the use of DNA tech­nol­o­gy. Researchers con­clud­ed that false con­fes­sions occur with an alarm­ing fre­quen­cy,” includ­ing about a quar­ter of all wrong­ful con­vic­tions and in at least 9 cas­es that end­ed in a wrong­ful cap­i­tal con­vic­tion. Leo and Drizin found that fac­tors such as police pres­sure to solve seri­ous crimes, age of the accused, and the length of the inter­ro­ga­tion can play a role in pro­duc­ing a false con­fes­sion. (See San Diego Union-Tribune, April 15, 2004; 82 North Carolina L. Rev. 891 (2004)). See Innocence. See Resources.
Citation Guide