Ron Briggs, spon­sor of the ini­tia­tive which expand­ed Californias death penal­ty law in 1978, recent­ly announced his sup­port for repeal of the law. Writing in the Los Angeles Times, Ron Briggs explained that the 1978 Briggs Initiative was meant to give pros­e­cu­tors bet­ter tools for met­ing out just pun­ish­ments, and that a broad­ened statute would serve as a warn­ing to all California evil­do­ers that the state would deliv­er swift and final jus­tice” and creat[e] a nation­al mod­el for cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment.” Thirty-four years lat­er, he and oth­er spon­sors have all inde­pen­dent­ly con­clud­ed that the sys­tem is not work­ing. Briggs wrote, Each of us remains a staunch Republican con­ser­v­a­tive, but our per­spec­tives on the death penal­ty have changed. We’d thought we would bring California sav­ings and safe­ty in deal­ing with con­vict­ed mur­der­ers. Instead, we con­tributed to a night­mar­ish sys­tem that cod­dles mur­der­ers and enrich­es lawyers. Our ini­tia­tive was intend­ed to bring about greater jus­tice for mur­der vic­tims. Never did we envi­sion a multi­bil­lion-dol­lar indus­try that packs mur­der­ers onto death row for decades of extreme­ly expen­sive incar­cer­a­tion. We thought we would emp­ty death row, not triple its pop­u­la­tion.” (empha­sis added). Briggs con­clud­ed, Had I known then what we do today, I would have pushed for strong life sen­tences with­out the pos­si­bil­i­ty of parole. I still believe that soci­ety must be pro­tect­ed from the most heinous crim­i­nals, and that they don’t deserve to ever again be free. But I’d like to see them serve their terms with the gen­er­al prison pop­u­la­tion, where they could be required to work and pay resti­tu­tion into the vic­tims’ com­pen­sa­tion fund.” Ron Briggs is cur­rent­ly a mem­ber of the Board of Supervisors in El Dorado County, California. Read full op-ed below.

February 122012

California’s death penal­ty law: It sim­ply does not work
We believed the Briggs ini­tia­tive — the death penal­ty mea­sure we wrote in 1977 — would bring greater jus­tice. We were wrong.
By Ron Briggs

In 1977, my dad, for­mer state Sen. John Briggs, my broth­er-in-law and I got togeth­er to dis­cuss California’s death penal­ty. We agreed it was inef­fec­tive and decid­ed a bal­lot ini­tia­tive was need­ed to expand the num­ber of mur­der cat­e­gories eli­gi­ble for cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment. We felt such changes would give pros­e­cu­tors bet­ter tools for met­ing out just pun­ish­ments, and that a broad­ened statute would serve as a warn­ing to all California evil­do­ers that the state would deliv­er swift and final justice.

We thought we were cre­at­ing a nation­al mod­el for capital punishment.

On a shoe­string bud­get we col­lect­ed more than 1 mil­lion sig­na­tures to put the propo­si­tion on the bal­lot. Half the sig­na­tures came via first-class busi­ness reply mail, which my wife, Kelly, and I man­u­al­ly processed. We did­n’t have lap­tops or self-adhe­sive stamps then, although we did have a bomb scan­ner, which we’d been trained to use by the FBI after they dis­cov­ered a ter­ror­ist plot to kill my dad.

On Nov. 7, 1978, California vot­ers passed the Briggs ini­tia­tive on the death penalty.

Back then, my future broth­er-in-law was Dad’s dis­trict chief of staff and I proud­ly served as my father’s per­son­al aide. Today Dad is retired, my broth­er-in-law is a California Superior Court judge and I am in my sec­ond term as a coun­ty super­vi­sor rep­re­sent­ing rur­al District IV in the coun­ty of El Dorado, east of Sacramento.

Recently, the three of us sat togeth­er under a rose trel­lis in the qui­et cool of morn­ing to talk pol­i­tics. Each of us remains a staunch Republican con­ser­v­a­tive, but our per­spec­tives on the death penal­ty have changed. We’d thought we would bring California sav­ings and safe­ty in deal­ing with con­vict­ed mur­der­ers. Instead, we con­tributed to a night­mar­ish sys­tem that cod­dles mur­der­ers and enrich­es lawyers. Our ini­tia­tive was intend­ed to bring about greater jus­tice for mur­der vic­tims. Never did we envi­sion a multi­bil­lion-dol­lar indus­try that packs mur­der­ers onto death row for decades of extreme­ly expen­sive incar­cer­a­tion. We thought we would emp­ty death row, not triple its population.

Each of us, inde­pen­dent­ly, has con­clud­ed that the death penal­ty isn’t work­ing for California.

I am enter­ing my fifth year as a coun­ty super­vi­sor, an office that has giv­en me first­hand expe­ri­ence of the fis­cal­ly ruinous effect of our death penal­ty ini­tia­tive. Each cap­i­tal case the dis­trict attor­ney files drains about $1 mil­lion from local cof­fers. And that’s just the expense to the coun­ty. Much more state and fed­er­al mon­ey is spent on spe­cial incar­cer­a­tion and on appeal after expen­sive appeal. If a retri­al is ordered, our coun­ty has to foot the bill all over again.

The polit­i­cal­ly con­ser­v­a­tive coun­ty of El Dorado is in the Sierra Nevada foothills. Ours is a small and close com­mu­ni­ty. Kelly and I have a dear friend whose hus­band was shot to death in their home, and we have anoth­er friend whose son was mur­dered. Every five years they are forced to attend parole hear­ings for the mur­der­ers of their loved ones. The anguish, anx­i­ety and grief in their eyes are indescribable.

A cou­ple of years ago I became acquaint­ed with a woman who in 1981 sur­vived being abduct­ed, raped, thrown down a gul­ly naked and shot mul­ti­ple times. For good mea­sure, her attack­er threw rocks at her head. On that same day, the man mur­dered the wom­an’s friend. Because of the death penal­ty sys­tem we put in place, the sur­vivor, a frag­ile moth­er of three, had to find courage to face her would-be killer again after he weaseled a tech­ni­cal appeal 26 years after the crime, forc­ing a full retri­al here in El Dorado. It yield­ed the same ver­dict, and it took a huge human toll on his living victim.

If the mur­der­er had been sen­tenced to life in prison with­out the pos­si­bil­i­ty of parole rather than to death, the long cycle of appeals could have been avoided.

I can­not think of a sin­gle turn­ing point in my think­ing on the death penal­ty. My Catholicism teach­es me that all life is pre­cious, and that’s cer­tain­ly part of my view­point these days. But what res­onates more in my mind is Dad’s fond­ness for say­ing facts are stub­born things.” With hind­sight’s 20 – 20 vision and three decades of obsti­nate data, it’s clear to my fam­i­ly that we cre­at­ed a fis­cal mon­ster that’s tak­ing a human toll on the very peo­ple we want­ed to protect.

The inef­fec­tive legal beast cre­at­ed by California’s death penal­ty laws costs tax­pay­ers more than $100 mil­lion annu­al­ly and ties up the lives of pros­e­cu­tors and vic­tims who could be mov­ing on to other things.

We thought our 1978 ini­tia­tive cre­at­ed a sys­tem to sup­port vic­tims’ fam­i­lies. It did­n’t. The only peo­ple ben­e­fit­ing today are the lawyers who han­dle expen­sive appeals and the crim­i­nals who are able to keep their cas­es alive interminably.

The Briggs death penal­ty law in California sim­ply does not work.

Had I known then what we do today, I would have pushed for strong life sen­tences with­out the pos­si­bil­i­ty of parole. I still believe that soci­ety must be pro­tect­ed from the most heinous crim­i­nals, and that they don’t deserve to ever again be free. But I’d like to see them serve their terms with the gen­er­al prison pop­u­la­tion, where they could be required to work and pay resti­tu­tion into the vic­tims’ compensation fund.

There are few do-overs” in life, espe­cial­ly in pol­i­tics. With the death penal­ty, though, 34 years lat­er I have an oppor­tu­ni­ty to set things right. The Briggs fam­i­ly has decid­ed to endorse the SAFE California cam­paign, a fall 2012 bal­lot ini­tia­tive that would replace the death penal­ty with a pun­ish­ment of life with­out the pos­si­bil­i­ty of parole. The state has anoth­er chance at real jus­tice. We should embrace it.

Ron Briggs is a mem­ber of the Board of Supervisors in El Dorado County.

(R. Briggs, California’s death penal­ty law: It sim­ply does not work,” Los Angeles Times, February 12, 2012). See New Voices and Recent Legislation. For more infor­ma­tion on the SAFE California cam­paign, click here.

Citation Guide