Carlos Moreno, who served as a Justice on California’s Supreme Court for near­ly a decade and upheld more than 200 death sen­tences, now sup­ports a bal­lot mea­sure to replace the death penal­ty with a sen­tence of life with­out parole because the sys­tem is bro­ken and unlike­ly to be fixed. Justice Moreno said that as long as cap­i­tal defen­dants are enti­tled to a fair tri­al and decent legal rep­re­sen­ta­tion, there’s no way the sys­tem can accom­plish its stat­ed goals — pun­ish­ment and deter­rence for the crim­i­nals, jus­tice for their vic­tims – in a time­ly man­ner with­out mon­ey that the state is either unable or unwill­ing to spend.” He added, I would think that we could fix the sys­tem, make it more effi­cient and actu­al­ly faster, but I just don’t see that com­ing any­where in the future. In California the peo­ple may be will­ing to sup­port the death penal­ty in prin­ci­ple but they’re not will­ing to fund it.” According to a 2011 study co-authored by fed­er­al Court of Appeals Judge Arthur Alarcon, the death penal­ty in California costs tax­pay­ers about $184 mil­lion per year. Justice Moreno con­clud­ed, “[T]here’s no chance California’s death penal­ty can ever be fixed. The mil­lions wast­ed on this bro­ken sys­tem would be much bet­ter spent keep­ing teach­ers, police and fire­fight­ers on their jobs.”

(B. Egelko, Ex-jus­tice who sup­ports death penal­ty backs mea­sure to abol­ish it,” San Francisco Chronicle, August 2, 2012). Californians will vote on a death penal­ty repeal mea­sure, Proposition 34, in November. See Costs. Listen to our pod­cast on Costs.

Citation Guide