Jim Petro (pic­tured), for­mer Attorney General of Ohio, strong­ly sup­port­ed the death penal­ty as a state leg­is­la­tor, believed the state would save mon­ey because of the death penal­ty, and that it would act as a deter­rent. But, he recent­ly said, Neither of those things have occurred, so I ask myself, Why would I vote for it again?’ I don’t think I would. I don’t think the law has done any­thing to ben­e­fit soci­ety and us. It’s cheap­er and, in my view, some­times a mis­take can be made, so per­haps we are bet­ter off with life with­out parole.” He added, We are prob­a­bly safer, bet­ter and smarter to not have a death penal­ty.” Many of Petro’s con­cerns are in his book, False Justice: Eight Myths that Convict the Innocent, in which he under­scores the risks of mis­take and iden­ti­fies flaws in how police and pros­e­cu­tors have han­dled cap­i­tal cas­es. He also not­ed that many pros­e­cu­tors rec­og­nize these prob­lems: I would bet cer­tain­ly well over half the pros­e­cu­tors in the coun­try look­ing at this book would ulti­mate­ly agree with most of the issues,” he said.

Ohio Supreme Court Justice Paul Pfeifer, who also helped write the state’s death penal­ty law, has like­wise changed his views and urged its repeal. Justice Pfeifer, a Republican, recent­ly told the state House of Representatives, The death sen­tence makes no sense to me at this point when you can have life with­out pos­si­bil­i­ty of parole. I don’t see what soci­ety gains from that.”

(M. Naymik, Jim Petro ques­tions about the death penal­ty stop short of call­ing for repeal,” Cleveland Plain Dealer, January 22, 2012). See Innocence, Life Without Parole and New Voices. The lat­est per­son in the coun­try to be exon­er­at­ed and freed from death row was from Ohio. Joe D’Ambrosio was exon­er­at­ed in 2012 after his 1989 con­vic­tion was over­turned because pros­e­cu­tors with­held cru­cial evi­dence from the defense. Six for­mer death row inmates from Ohio have been exon­er­at­ed since 1973.

Citation Guide