In a recent op-ed in the Louisville Courier-Journal, three for­mer Kentucky pros­e­cu­tors advo­cat­ed for repeal of the death penal­ty. Citing the find­ings of a study by the American Bar Association on Kentucky’s law, Joseph P. Gutmann (pic­tured), Stephen Ryan, and J. Stewart Schneider said, “[T]he death penal­ty is bro­ken beyond repair in Kentucky.” Among the report’s find­ings were a rever­sal rate of 60% in death penal­ty cas­es, a lack of stan­dards for eye­wit­ness iden­ti­fi­ca­tion and inter­ro­ga­tions, and pub­lic defend­er case­loads that far exceed the nation­al aver­age, despite pay that is 31% low­er than sur­round­ing states. A poll tak­en around the time of the report found 62% of Kentucky vot­ers in sup­port of a mora­to­ri­um on exe­cu­tions. The for­mer pros­e­cu­tors rec­om­mend­ed repeal: Without ques­tion, this is a dif­fi­cult issue, and efforts to fix’ the death penal­ty in Kentucky will be cost­ly and time-con­sum­ing. But there is one approach that is sim­pler and less expen­sive: Abolish the death penal­ty and replace it with life in prison with­out parole for con­vict­ed offenders.…Replacing [the death penal­ty] with life with­out parole is the best approach for our state — remov­ing the pos­si­bil­i­ty that an inno­cent per­son will be exe­cut­ed, sav­ing lim­it­ed tax dol­lars, pro­tect­ing pub­lic safe­ty and pro­vid­ing cer­tain­ty and jus­tice to the fam­i­lies of vic­tims.” Read the op-ed below.

End Death Penalty

Three years ago, a report was released by the American Bar Association reveal­ing seri­ous prob­lems relat­ed to fair­ness and accu­ra­cy in the use of the death penal­ty in Kentucky.

The report fol­lowed an exhaus­tive two-year review of every case in which the death penal­ty had been imposed in the com­mon­wealth since 1976; the review was con­duct­ed by an assess­ment team of Kentucky attor­neys, for­mer Kentucky Supreme Court jus­tices and law school pro­fes­sors. The find­ings were numer­ous and trou­bling. Among them:

•Of the last 78 peo­ple sen­tenced to death in Kentucky, 50 have had a death sen­tence over­turned on appeal by Kentucky or fed­er­al courts — an error rate of more than 60 percent.

•At least 10 of the 78 peo­ple sen­tenced to death were rep­re­sent­ed by defense attor­neys who were subsequently disbarred.

•There is no require­ment that evi­dence in crim­i­nal cas­es be retained as long as a defen­dant remains incar­cer­at­ed, and the prob­lem of lost evi­dence sig­nif­i­cant­ly dimin­ish­es the effec­tive­ness of a state law that allows post-con­vic­tion DNA test­ing pri­or to execution.

•There are no uni­form stan­dards on eye­wit­ness iden­ti­fi­ca­tions and inter­ro­ga­tions, and many of Kentucky’s largest law enforce­ment agen­cies do not ful­ly adhere to best prac­tices to guard against false eye­wit­ness iden­ti­fi­ca­tions and false confessions.

•Kentucky pub­lic defend­ers han­dling cap­i­tal cas­es have case­loads that far exceed nation­al aver­ages and salaries that are 31 per­cent below those of sim­i­lar­ly expe­ri­enced attor­neys in surrounding states.

•There are no statewide stan­dards gov­ern­ing the qual­i­fi­ca­tions and train­ing of attor­neys appoint­ed to han­dle capital cases.

•Kentucky does not have ade­quate pro­tec­tions to ensure that death sen­tences are not imposed or car­ried out on a defen­dant with mental disabilities.

•There is a lack of data-keep­ing through­out the admin­is­tra­tion of the death penal­ty in Kentucky, mak­ing it impos­si­ble to guar­an­tee that the sys­tem is oper­at­ing fair­ly, effec­tive­ly and efficiently.

These find­ings were so dis­turb­ing that the assess­ment team rec­om­mend­ed that Kentucky sus­pend all exe­cu­tions until the issues are ade­quate­ly addressed. A poll tak­en when the report was released found 62 per­cent of like­ly Kentucky vot­ers statewide sup­port­ed a tem­po­rary halt to exe­cu­tions. The sup­port for a sus­pen­sion was con­sis­tent across the state regard­less of gen­der, geog­ra­phy or party registration.

Unfortunately, there has been no sig­nif­i­cant change in Kentucky’s death penal­ty law since this sober­ing report was released, although leg­is­la­tion has been pro­posed to address some of the prob­lems it iden­ti­fied. Judicial action tem­porar­i­ly stop­ping exe­cu­tions in Kentucky has been relat­ed to con­cerns about the method of exe­cu­tions and drugs used, not the find­ings of the ABA team.

Without ques­tion, this is a dif­fi­cult issue, and efforts to fix” the death penal­ty in Kentucky will be cost­ly and time-consuming.

But there is one approach that is sim­pler and less expen­sive: Abolish the death penal­ty and replace it with life in prison with­out parole for convicted offenders.

Studies have shown the cost of numer­ous legal appeals prompt­ed by death sen­tences is far greater than the cost of lock­ing up offend­ers for the rest of their lives. The death penal­ty also traps the fam­i­lies of vic­tims in a decades-long cycle of uncer­tain­ty, court hear­ings and wait­ing for an exe­cu­tion that may never come.

The ABA review sug­gests that the death penal­ty is bro­ken beyond repair in Kentucky. Replacing it with life with­out parole is the best approach for our state — remov­ing the pos­si­bil­i­ty that an inno­cent per­son will be exe­cut­ed, sav­ing lim­it­ed tax dol­lars, pro­tect­ing pub­lic safe­ty and pro­vid­ing cer­tain­ty and jus­tice to the fam­i­lies of victims.

Joseph P. Gutmann is a for­mer Jefferson County Assistant Commonwealth’s Attorney. Stephen Ryan is a retired cir­cuit court judge and for­mer pros­e­cu­tor, defense attor­ney and pro­ba­tion and parole offi­cer. J. Stewart Schneider is stat­ed sup­ply speak­er of Community Presbyterian Church of Bellefonte and for­mer Commonwealth’s Attorney for the 32nd Judicial Circuit in Boyd County.

(J. Gutmann, et al., End death penal­ty,” Courier-Journal, December 26, 2014). See New Voices and Studies.

Citation Guide