Family mem­bers of mur­der vic­tims tes­ti­fied before the Maryland Senate Judiciary Committee on March 6 about the painful toll the death penal­ty has tak­en on their lives, stat­ing that the resources spent on seek­ing death sen­tences could be bet­ter used else­where. I’ve watched too many fam­i­lies go through this to make me believe the sys­tem will ever work,” said Kathy Garcia, whose nephew was mur­dered 20 years ago. She con­tin­ued, The death penal­ty divides fam­i­lies at the very time they need each oth­er the most.” Other fam­i­ly mem­bers of mur­dered vic­tims agreed, sug­gest­ing that the mon­ey spent on the death penal­ty could be bet­ter used in pro­vid­ing coun­sel­ing and oth­er sup­port to sur­vivors. Vicki Schieber, whose daugh­ter was mur­dered in Philadelphia in 1998, told the com­mit­tee that years of death penal­ty appeals are excru­ci­at­ing to fam­i­lies. The sys­tem is just too painful,” she said. 

A study released the same day showed that Maryland tax­pay­ers have spent at least $186 mil­lion on the death penal­ty since 1978. Senator Lisa Gladden (D), the chief spon­sor of the bill to repeal Maryland’s death penal­ty, said that the $186 mil­lion could instead go to social ser­vices. What could we pur­chase with [$186 mil­lion]? We could cov­er all the unin­sured. We could pro­vide tuition assis­tance or drug treat­ment two or three times over.”
(“Murder vic­tims’ fam­i­lies say death penal­ty exacts toll on their lives,” by George P. Matysek, Jr., Catholic News Service, March 12, 2008). See Recent Legislation and Victims.

Citation Guide