At a recent event at Willamette University in Oregon, var­i­ous state lead­ers in the fields of law and crim­i­nal jus­tice spoke crit­i­cal­ly about the state’s death penal­ty. Former Supreme Court Chief Justice Paul De Muniz (pic­tured) said the death penal­ty was bad pub­lic pol­i­cy,” almost nev­er result­ing in an exe­cu­tion. He spoke of hav­ing defend­ed a mur­der­er sen­tenced to death in 1988. Twenty-five years lat­er, the Justice not­ed, he is now retired after a full career in the law, while the inmate is still in the midst of his appeals on death row. Noting the $28 mil­lion spent annu­al­ly on the death penal­ty, Justice De Muniz said, The death penal­ty is get­ting a pass’ from leg­isla­tive scruti­ny, when look­ing for ways to trim Oregon’s bud­get to fund starv­ing schools and pub­lic safe­ty.” The for­mer Superintendent of the State Penitentiary, Frank Thompson, who presided over the last exe­cu­tions in the state, called the cur­rent sys­tem a failed pub­lic pol­i­cy.” Thompson said that he was con­cerned about his staff, who had the respon­si­bil­i­ty of car­ry­ing out exe­cu­tions, and about the risk that some inno­cent peo­ple have been exe­cut­ed in the U.S. Retired Supreme Court Justice Edwin Peterson also announced at the sold-out event that he would begin speak­ing out pub­licly against the state’s death penalty. 

(T. Buckley, Killing doesn’t Pay,” Willamette Live, May 2013). See Cost and Innocence. Read more New Voices.

Citation Guide