On March 4, Houston District Judge Kevin Fine grant­ed a pre­tri­al motion in a cap­i­tal case and declared the death penal­ty in Texas uncon­sti­tu­tion­al. Judge Fine said the state’s law vio­lates a defendant’s right to due process because of the risk of exe­cut­ing an inno­cent per­son. The judge based his rul­ing on stud­ies around the coun­try and in Texas that indi­cat­ed, it can only be con­clud­ed that inno­cent peo­ple have been executed….Are you will­ing to have your broth­er, your father, your moth­er be the sac­ri­fi­cial lamb, to be the inno­cent per­son exe­cut­ed so that we can have a death penal­ty so that we can exe­cute those who are deserv­ing of the death penal­ty?” The defen­dan­t’s defense attor­neys were pleased with the judge’s deci­sion, although they believe the rul­ing will be appealed and prob­a­bly reversed. Sandra Guerra Thompson, pro­fes­sor at the University of Houston Law Center, said tri­al judges some­times issue rul­ings that are unlike­ly to stand up on appeal to start a dia­logue in the judi­cial branch. While Texas has con­sis­tent­ly led the nation in annu­al exe­cu­tions, the state has fol­lowed a nation­wide trend with a decline in new death sen­tences in 2009. UPDATE: Judge Fine decid­ed to delay a final rul­ing on the motion until both sides have a chance to be heard. The defen­dan­t’s death penal­ty tri­al has been put on hold, and a hear­ing will be held on April 27.

(B. Rogers, Judge declares death penal­ty uncon­sti­tu­tion­al,” Houston Chronicle, March 5, 2010). See Innocence and New Voices.

Citation Guide