A recent arti­cle in Time looks at the career of Travis County District Attorney Ronnie Earle. The arti­cle traces Earle’s evolv­ing opin­ion on the death penal­ty since he was first elect­ed D.A. in Texas in 1976, the year the U.S. Supreme Court rein­stat­ed the death penal­ty. Among oth­er con­cerns, ques­tions of inno­cence have caused Earle to grow increas­ing­ly skep­ti­cal about the death penal­ty. The article notes:

But like the rest of us, Earle has now watched bro­ken souls walk free after years of wrong­ful incar­cer­a­tion; 56 have been released from death row in the past decade, either because they were deemed inno­cent or because of pro­ce­dur­al mis­takes, accord­ing to the Death Penalty Information Center. Unlike the rest of us, Earle still has to enforce the death penal­ty. He is often plagued by doubts when he must decide whether to seek death. I ago­nize over it,” he says. There was a time when I thought the death penal­ty ought to have wider appli­ca­tion, but my views have evolved.” Today decid­ing whether to seek the death penal­ty is eas­i­ly the hard­est part of his job. 

(Time, July 14, 2003). See Innocence and New Voices.

Citation Guide