Recently, var­i­ous vic­tims and rel­a­tives of vic­tims have tes­ti­fied before state leg­is­la­tures con­cern­ing the death penal­ty. In Connecticut, a woman who had been attacked by con­vict­ed mur­der­er Michael Ross, tes­ti­fied that she nev­er­the­less oppos­es his exe­cu­tion. And in North Carolina, the sis­ter of a man who was mur­dered in 2003 urged state leg­is­la­tors to recon­sid­er the death penal­ty.

Vivian Dobson, who was attacked by Ross in 1983, said that the death penal­ty re-trau­ma­tizes vic­tims’ fam­i­ly mem­bers and wrong­ly focus­es pub­lic atten­tion on the guilty offend­er instead of the inno­cent vic­tims. Dobson recent­ly told mem­bers of the Connecticut House of Representatives that she does not want Ross exe­cut­ed, not­ing, I don’t want to be a part of killing some­body else.… I can’t do it. That’s not me.” The Connecticut House, how­ev­er, vot­ed 89 – 60 against a bill to replace the state’s death penal­ty with life with­out parole. (Hartford Courant and Associated Press, March 30, 2005).

In North Carolina, Patricia Parker, whose broth­er was mur­dered by an unknown assailant, joined five oth­er vic­tims’ fam­i­ly mem­bers to urge law­mak­ers to pass a bill that would impose a two-year mora­to­ri­um on exe­cu­tions while leg­is­la­tors review the cur­rent sys­tem. Parker not­ed that her broth­er’s death forced her to re-exam­ine the judi­cial sys­tem and the death penal­ty, which she now believes is applied unfair­ly and risks inno­cent lives. Parker stat­ed, I do not want any­thing done that makes anoth­er mis­take. I don’t want to ever have to think that the wrong per­son was pun­ished for my broth­er’s death. It will only bring more heartache in the world.” (Associated Press, March 302005).

See Victims and New Voices.

Citation Guide