![](https://img.dpic-cdn.org/images/legacy/images/scotus.jpg?w=150&h=150&q=60&auto=format&fit=crop&dm=1560350711&s=ffa120c0c55228f7d4b790166d7b6b91)
A new article to be published in the American Criminal Law Review explores the constitutionality of the death penalty for those convicted of felony murder, i.e., those who participated in a serious crime in which a death occurred, but were not directly responsible for the death. The article is by Joseph Trigilio and Tracy Casadio, both Deputy Federal Public Defenders in California and is titled “Executing Those Who Do Not Kill.” The authors argue that the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Tison v. Arizona (1987) should be overturned. Tison allows the death penalty for certain non-triggermen if the defendant was a major participant in the underlying felony and acted with a reckless disregard for human life. According to the law review, the analysis in Tison has been overturned in other cases, “Tison leads a trilogy of cases, including Stanford v. Kentucky and Penry v. Lynaugh, that represent a sharp break from a tradition of careful scrutiny on proportionality that considers both objective and subjective criteria in determining whether a certain category of defendants is constitutionally eligible for a death sentence.” Both Stanford and Penry have been overturned, and the authors maintain that, “under the proportionality analysis articulated in Atkins v. Virginia, Roper v. Simmons, and Kennedy v. Louisiana, the contemporary ‘standards of decency’ require a further narrowing of death penalty eligibility for those who do not kill nor intend to kill.” The article concludes, “In 2009, the Court cemented the new proportionality paradigm in Kennedy, expressly basing its analysis on the framework of Roper, Atkins, Coker, and Enmund. In so doing, the Court abandoned Tison’s analytical framework as no longer authoritative. The time has come to overturn Tison and to bar the execution of felony-murder accomplices who neither kill nor intend to kill.”
(J. Trigilio and T. Casadio, “Executing Those Who Do Not Kill: A Categorical Approach to Proportional Sentencing,” American Criminal Law Review, forthcoming). See Law Reviews and U.S. Supreme Court; see also Executions of Those Who Did not Kill.
United States Supreme Court
Jul 17, 2024
![United States Supreme Court Issues Rare Last-Minute Stay for Ruben Gutierrez](https://img.dpic-cdn.org/images/RubenGutierrezTX.jpeg?w=300&h=300&q=60&auto=format&fit=crop&dm=1591141479&s=2506dff21f12f6cdd82d1f1f1d938fef)
United States Supreme Court Issues Rare Last-Minute Stay for Ruben Gutierrez
Crimes Punishable by Death
Jul 12, 2024
![Articles of Interest: Op-ed says new Tennessee law that expands the death penalty to child rape “creates more problems than it solves.”](https://img.dpic-cdn.org/images/Sarah-McGee.png?w=300&h=300&q=60&auto=format&fit=crop&dm=1720792516&s=d0c474b748041da203999dc7e7f6ac46)
Articles of Interest: Op-ed says new Tennessee law that expands the death penalty to child rape “creates more problems than it solves.”
United States Supreme Court
Nov 02, 2023
![Under Recent State Legislation, Courts in Ohio and Kentucky Rule Four Men Ineligible for Execution Due to Serious Mental Illness](https://img.dpic-cdn.org/images/KentuckySMIHearing.png?w=300&h=300&q=60&auto=format&fit=crop&dm=1645646466&s=a38d25cdc2b42685a1d3bd18b434b373)