In a recent op-ed in the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, for­mer U.S. President Jimmy Carter called for the end of the death penal­ty. President Carter cit­ed the risk of wrong­ful exe­cu­tions, the lack of evi­dence of deter­rence, and the costs of pros­e­cu­tion as rea­sons to abol­ish cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment. He wrote, “[T]here has nev­er been any evi­dence that the death penal­ty reduces cap­i­tal crimes or that crimes increased when exe­cu­tions stopped. Tragic mis­takes are preva­lent. DNA test­ing and oth­er fac­tors have caused 138 death sen­tences to be reversed since I left the governor’s office. The cost for pros­e­cut­ing exe­cut­ed crim­i­nals is astro­nom­i­cal. Since 1973, California has spent rough­ly $4 bil­lion in cap­i­tal cas­es lead­ing to only 13 exe­cu­tions, amount­ing to about $307 mil­lion each.” President Carter also cit­ed the unfair appli­ca­tion of the death penal­ty as an espe­cial­ly com­pelling rea­son for repeal: Perhaps the strongest argu­ment against the death penal­ty is extreme bias against the poor, minori­ties or those with dimin­ished men­tal capac­i­ty. Although homi­cide vic­tims are six times more like­ly to be black rather than white, 77 per­cent of death penal­ty cas­es involve white vic­tims. Also, it is hard to imag­ine a rich white per­son going to the death cham­ber after being defend­ed by expen­sive lawyers. This demon­strates a high­er val­ue placed on the lives of white Americans.” Read full op-ed below.

Show death penal­ty the door
By Jimmy Carter

For many rea­sons, it is time for Georgia and oth­er states to abol­ish the death penal­ty. A recent poll showed that 61 per­cent of Americans would choose a pun­ish­ment oth­er than the death penal­ty for murder.

Also, just 1 per­cent of police chiefs think that expand­ing the death penal­ty would reduce vio­lent crime. This change in pub­lic opin­ion is steadi­ly restrict­ing cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment, both in state leg­is­la­tures and in the federal courts.

As Georgia’s chief exec­u­tive, I com­pet­ed with oth­er gov­er­nors to reduce our prison pop­u­la­tions. We clas­si­fied all new inmates to pre­pare them for a pro­duc­tive time in prison, fol­lowed by care­ful­ly mon­i­tored ear­ly-release and work-release pro­grams. We recruit­ed vol­un­teers from ser­vice clubs who act­ed as pro­ba­tion offi­cers and adopt­ed” one prospec­tive parolee for whom they found a job when parole was grant­ed. At that time, in the 1970s, only one in 1,000 Americans was in prison.

Our nation’s focus is now on pun­ish­ment, not reha­bil­i­ta­tion. Although vio­lent crimes have not increased, the United States has the high­est incar­cer­a­tion rate in the world, with more than 7.43 per 1,000 adults impris­oned at the end of 2010. Our coun­try is almost alone in our fas­ci­na­tion with the death penal­ty. Ninety per­cent of all exe­cu­tions are car­ried out in China, Iran, Saudi Arabia and the United States.

One argu­ment for the death penal­ty is that it is a strong deter­rent to mur­der and oth­er vio­lent crimes. In fact, evi­dence shows just the oppo­site. The homi­cide rate is at least five times greater in the United States than in any Western European coun­try, all with­out the death penalty.

Southern states car­ry out more than 80 per­cent of the exe­cu­tions but have a high­er mur­der rate than any oth­er region. Texas has by far the most exe­cu­tions, but its homi­cide rate is twice that of Wisconsin, the first state to abol­ish the death penal­ty. Look at sim­i­lar adja­cent states: There are more cap­i­tal crimes in South Dakota, Connecticut and Virginia (with death sen­tences) than neigh­bor­ing North Dakota, Massachusetts and West Virginia (with­out death penal­ties). Furthermore, there has nev­er been any evi­dence that the death penal­ty reduces cap­i­tal crimes or that crimes increased when exe­cu­tions stopped. Tragic mis­takes are preva­lent. DNA test­ing and oth­er fac­tors have caused 138 death sen­tences to be reversed since I left the governor’s office.

The cost for pros­e­cut­ing exe­cut­ed crim­i­nals is astro­nom­i­cal. Since 1973, California has spent rough­ly $4 bil­lion in cap­i­tal cas­es lead­ing to only 13 exe­cu­tions, amount­ing to about $307 million each.

Some devout Christians are among the most fer­vent advo­cates of the death penal­ty, con­tra­dict­ing Jesus Christ and mis­in­ter­pret­ing Holy Scriptures and numer­ous exam­ples of mer­cy. We remem­ber God’s for­give­ness of Cain, who killed Abel, and the adul­ter­er King David, who had Bathsheba’s hus­band killed. Jesus for­gave an adul­ter­ous woman sen­tenced to be stoned to death and explained away the eye for an eye” scripture.

There is a stark dif­fer­ence between Protestant and Catholic believ­ers. Many Protestant lead­ers are in the fore­front of demand­ing ulti­mate pun­ish­ment. Official Catholic pol­i­cy con­demns the death penal­ty. Perhaps the strongest argu­ment against the death penal­ty is extreme bias against the poor, minori­ties or those with dimin­ished men­tal capac­i­ty. Although homi­cide vic­tims are six times more like­ly to be black rather than white, 77 per­cent of death penal­ty cas­es involve white vic­tims. Also, it is hard to imag­ine a rich white per­son going to the death cham­ber after being defend­ed by expen­sive lawyers. This demon­strates a high­er val­ue placed on the lives of white Americans.

It is clear that there are over­whelm­ing eth­i­cal, finan­cial, and reli­gious rea­sons to abol­ish the death penalty.

Jimmy Carter was the 39th pres­i­dent and is founder of The Carter Center in Atlanta.

(J. Carter, Show death penal­ty the door,” Atlanta Journal-Constitution, April 25, 2012). Read more New Voices on the death penal­ty. Listen to DPIC’s pod­cast on Deterrence.

Citation Guide