On January 20, a spe­cial mas­ter appoint­ed to review the con­duct of an appeals court judge who would not order her court to stay open late to receive a death penal­ty appeal, con­clud­ed that her con­duct did not mer­it removal from office. Special Master David Berchelmann of San Antonio found that the action of Judge Sharon Keller, Presiding Judge of the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, does not war­rant removal from office or fur­ther rep­ri­mand beyond the pub­lic humil­i­a­tion she has sure­ly suf­fered.” Partly as a result of Judge Keller’s refusal to keep the court open beyond 5 pm, Michael Richard’s appeal was not filed and he was exe­cut­ed the same day. Richard’s attor­neys had asked that the court stay open late to receive their appeal that had been delayed by com­put­er prob­lems. The appeal chal­lenged Texas’ lethal injec­tion process in light of an announce­ment by the U.S. Supreme Court that same day. All oth­er inmates around the coun­try were rou­tine­ly grant­ed stays of exe­cu­tion after that day while the Supreme Court con­sid­ered the con­sti­tu­tion­al­i­ty of lethal injec­tion. Judge Berchelmann’s find­ings will be sent to the judi­cial con­duct com­mis­sion to decide whether any fur­ther action is warranted.

(M. Robbins, Special Master Finds CCA Presiding Judge Sharon Keller Should Not Be Punished,” Texas Lawyer, January 20, 2010.) See also Arbitrariness.

Citation Guide