On July 15, the House of Representatives of North Carolina vot­ed 61 – 53 to pass the Racial Justice Act. A sim­i­lar bill already passed the state sen­ate, though that bill con­tained an amend­ment to bypass some objec­tions to the state’s exe­cu­tion process. The new law, if final­ly approved, would allow judges to con­sid­er whether racial bias played a role in the deci­sion to seek or impose the death penal­ty. This is a fair­ness bill,” said Rep. Larry Womble, the Forsyth Democrat who helped cham­pi­on the bill. If we’re going to kill peo­ple, we must be as fair and objec­tive as we can. This allows one more chance for jus­tice to be blind. … It’s not a get-out-of-jail free card for anybody.”

Studies in North Carolina and else­where have shown that defen­dants are much more like­ly to be sen­tenced to death if they killed a white vic­tim than if they had killed a black vic­tim. In 1987, the U.S. Supreme Court held in McCleskey v. Kemp that, unless new leg­is­la­tion was passed, defen­dants would have to do more than just show the pres­ence of racial dis­par­i­ties through stud­ies. The U.S. House of Represenatives passed a sim­i­lar Racial Justice Act on two occa­sions that would have applied to all states, but the Senate did not pass the bill. The only oth­er state to pass a Racial Justice Act is Kentucky, where the law allows chal­lenges on a pre-tri­al basis rather than through appeals.

(See DPIC research and M. Biesecker, Death penal­ty bill pro­vokes a bat­tle,” News & Observer (NC), July 15, 2009. See also Race and Recent Legislative Activity.

Citation Guide