Lester Bower was exe­cut­ed in Texas on June 3 despite main­tain­ing his inno­cence through­out the 30 years he spent on death row. The evi­dence of Bower’s inno­cence includ­ed tes­ti­mo­ny from a woman who said that her boyfriend and three of his friends — not Bower — had com­mit­ted the mur­ders for which Bower was exe­cut­ed. The wit­ness came for­ward in 1989, after read­ing that Bower had been sen­tenced to death for the crime her boyfriend had con­fessed to com­mit­ting six years ear­li­er. In 2012, a judge reject­ed Bower’s request to present the tes­ti­mo­ny to a jury, say­ing, the new evi­dence pro­duced by the defen­dant could con­ceiv­ably have pro­duced a dif­fer­ent result at trial…it does not prove by clear and con­vinc­ing evi­dence that the defen­dant is actu­al­ly inno­cent.” Maurice Possley, a senior researcher for the National Registry of Exonerations, explained the judge’s deci­sion: He points out in pret­ty clear terms that this guy prob­a­bly would have been found not guilty had this evi­dence been avail­able at tri­al. But now, all these years lat­er, he can’t meet the new stan­dard, which is actu­al inno­cence. That was not the stan­dard at tri­al. Then it was guilty beyond a rea­son­able doubt.” Samuel Gross, edi­tor and co-founder of the reg­istry, said, To me it’s one of the most trou­bling fea­tures of our jus­tice sys­tem. In the absence of pro­ce­dur­al error, you have no effec­tive escape valve. We don’t have a pro­ce­dure for review­ing con­vic­tions for accuracy.”

(T. Madigan, Did Texas Execute an Innocent Lester Bower?,” Politico, June 14, 2015.) See Innocence.

Citation Guide