One attorney’s appeal brief on behalf of a Texas death row inmate was so poorly written that State District Judge Noe Gonzalez of Edinburg wrote that “Applicant totally misinterprets what actually occurred in this case.” A committee of citizens and attorneys filed a complaint about the appellate lawyer with the State Bar of Texas, but nothing was done: the lawyer remains on the state’s list of approved death penalty attorneys, and the client remains on death row.
The problem is widespread and Judge Cheryl Johnson, a Republican on the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, remarked, “It’s a problem. It needs to be addressed. But I don’t think there are any easy solutions to it.”
Ultimately, it is the defendant who suffers from such ineffective representation. According to an investigation by the San Antonio Express- News, “Just last month, Texas executed Justin Fuller, whose appointed lawyer filed a habeas challenge with rambling claims, glaring typos and incoherent repetitions. Another execution is scheduled in January for an inmate whose appointed lawyer filed two pages — upward of 100 is more common — that raised only one claim, and experts say it was fatally flawed.”
(Maro Robbins, San Antonio Express-News, Sept. 25, 2006). See Representation.
Arbitrariness
Feb 04, 2025
Florida Legislature Passes Unconstitutional Bill that Mandates the Death Penalty for “Unauthorized Aliens”
Arbitrariness
Oct 29, 2024
Hearings Begin on Constitutional Challenge to Kansas’ Death Penalty and Capital Jury Selection Process
Arbitrariness
Jan 03, 2024
