Live Updates: Larry Roberts Becomes the 200th Person Exonerated from Death Row

Updated Jul 02, 2024 4:45 pm

Publications & Testimony

Items: 1381 — 1390


Sep 20, 2019

Federal Appeals Court Overturns North Carolina Death Sentence for Juror Misconduct Based on Improper Consultation With Pastor During Deliberations

A fed­er­al appeals court has vacat­ed the death sen­tence imposed on a North Carolina death-row pris­on­er, find­ing that one of his jurors improp­er­ly con­sult­ed her pas­tor about her deci­sion and then com­mu­ni­cat­ed the pas­tor’s advice to fel­low jurors. In a 2 – 1 deci­sion, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit ruled on September 12, 2019 that William Leroy Barnes (pic­tured) had been denied his Sixth Amendment right to tri­al by an impar­tial jury and reversed…

Read More

Sep 19, 2019

American Bar Association Death Penalty Representation Project Has Removed 100 Prisoners from Death Row

In February 2017, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit over­turned the con­vic­tion and death sen­tence of Tennessee death-row pris­on­er Andrew Lee Thomas, Jr., rul­ing that Shelby County District Attorney General Amy Weirich had uncon­sti­tu­tion­al­ly with­held evi­dence that a key pros­e­cu­tion wit­ness had been paid for her coop­er­a­tion in the case and then delib­er­ate­ly elicit­ed per­jured tes­ti­mo­ny from the wit­ness that she had…

Read More

Sep 17, 2019

Supporters Rally for New Trial for Rodney Reed, Sentenced to Death by All-White Jury in Jim Crow Trial’ in Texas

Supporters of Rodney Reed (pic­tured) are call­ing for a new tri­al for the Texas death-row pris­on­er sen­tenced to death in 1998 by an all-white jury in a racial­ly charged tri­al. On September 10, 2019, Reed’s fam­i­ly and sup­port­ers protest­ed Texas’ death penal­ty out­side the governor’s man­sion in Austin. Their plea for a new tri­al based on evi­dence of his inno­cence has been joined by a grow­ing cho­rus of sup­port­ers, which include the Innocence Project, the victim’s…

Read More

Sep 16, 2019

California Supreme Court Declines to Halt Death-Penalty Trials During State Execution Moratorium

The California Supreme Court has declined to review the peti­tions of two Los Angeles County defen­dants who had asked the Court to halt cap­i­tal pros­e­cu­tions in the wake of Governor Gavin Newsoms deci­sion to impose a mora­to­ri­um on exe­cu­tions. The defen­dants had argued that there was an uncon­sti­tu­tion­al risk that jurors’ knowl­edge about the much-pub­li­cized mora­to­ri­um would lead them to believe that any death sen­tence they might impose was unlike­ly to be carried…

Read More

Sep 16, 2019

Death Penalty News and Developments for the Week of September 16 — September 222019

NEWS — September 19: Oregon Governor Kate Brown has announced she will not call a spe­cial ses­sion to address whether the state’s new law lim­it­ing the types of mur­ders pun­ish­able by death applies to future resen­tenc­ing pro­ceed­ings for pris­on­ers cur­rent­ly on the state’s death row. The new law, which goes into effect on September 29, is not retroac­tive and would not over­turn exist­ing death sen­tences. However, it applies to all future cap­i­tal sen­tenc­ing pro­ceed­ings, including…

Read More

Sep 13, 2019

Commentators Criticize Pennsylvania Death Penalty, Call for Reform or Abolition

As the September 11, 2019 Pennsylvania Supreme Court argu­ment date approached in two cas­es chal­leng­ing the con­sti­tu­tion­al­i­ty of the state’s death penal­ty, com­men­ta­tors and stake­hold­ers weighed in on the case in op-eds across the state. These opin­ion arti­cles high­light­ed the work of a June 2018 report by the Pennsylvania Task Force and Advisory Committee on Capital Punishment that found deep flaws in the admin­is­tra­tion of the Commonwealth’s death penal­ty, as well as the…

Read More

Sep 12, 2019

Pennsylvania Supreme Court Hears Argument on Constitutionality of Death Penalty

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court (mem­bers pic­tured) heard oral argu­ment on September 11, 2019 on whether to exer­cise its extra­or­di­nary King’s Bench” pow­ers to deter­mine whether the death penal­ty, as cur­rent­ly applied in the Commonwealth, vio­lates the Pennsylvania con­sti­tu­tion. If the court agrees to reach the con­sti­tu­tion­al issue, it has the pow­er to strike down the death penal­ty, uphold its con­sti­tu­tion­al­i­ty, or issue direc­tives or stan­dards regard­ing its future…

Read More