Publications & Testimony

Items: 2471 — 2480


Mar 07, 2016

U.S. Supreme Court Grants New Trial to Louisiana Death Row Inmate

The U.S. Supreme Court issued a per curi­am deci­sion on March 7 grant­i­ng a new tri­al to Louisiana death row inmate Michael Wearry as a result of mul­ti­ple acts of mis­con­duct by pros­e­cu­tors in his case. No phys­i­cal evi­dence linked Wearry to the mur­der. His con­vic­tion was based large­ly on the tes­ti­mo­ny of an infor­mant, Sam Scott, who came for­ward two years after the crime with an account that did not match the details of the crime. Scott altered his story…

Read More

Mar 04, 2016

Florida Legislature Passes Bill Requiring Agreement of 10 Jurors Before Judge May Impose Death Sentence

UPDATE: Gov. Rick Scott signed the bill into law on March 7. Previously: The Florida leg­is­la­ture passed a bill on March 3 to restruc­ture its death penal­ty statute in response to the U.S. Supreme Court’s rul­ing in Hurst v. Florida, which declared the state’s death penal­ty pro­ce­dures uncon­sti­tu­tion­al. The bill mod­i­fies Florida’s prac­tice of per­mit­ting judges to impose death sen­tences with­out the unan­i­mous agree­ment of jurors by…

Read More

Mar 03, 2016

Alabama Judge Rules Capital Sentencing Scheme Unconstitutional

Jefferson County, Alabama Circuit Judge Tracie Todd (pic­tured) ruled on March 3 that Alabama’s cap­i­tal sen­tenc­ing pro­ce­dure vio­lates the U.S. Constitution. Judge Todd barred the death penal­ty for four cap­i­tal mur­der defen­dants, say­ing that Alabama’s use of judi­cial over­ride violates the…

Read More

Mar 02, 2016

Delaware Supreme Court to Consider Constitutionality of State’s Death Penalty Law

Delaware pub­lic defend­ers have filed a brief in the Delaware Supreme Court argu­ing that the state’s death sen­tenc­ing pro­ce­dures are uncon­sti­tu­tion­al. In their brief, the defend­ers describe​“mul­ti­ple con­sti­tu­tion­al prob­lems” that they say​“require Delaware’s death penal­ty scheme to be sub­stan­tial­ly restruc­tured.” These include sev­er­al pro­ce­dures that they say are uncon­sti­tu­tion­al under the U.S. Supreme Court’s recent 8 – 1 decision in…

Read More

Mar 01, 2016

NEW VOICES: Republican Former Death Penalty Supporter Leads Repeal Effort in Utah

Stephen Urquhart (pic­tured), a Republican state sen­a­tor in Utah, sup­port­ed the death penal­ty until about a year ago, when a friend con­vinced him that cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment did­n’t fit his con­ser­v­a­tive beliefs. Now Urquhart sees the death penal­ty as inef­fi­cient, cost­ly, and wrong and is the lead spon­sor of a bill to repeal the state’s death penal­ty. He said con­cerns about the cost of the death penal­ty and the risk of exe­cut­ing an inno­cent person changed…

Read More

Feb 29, 2016

U.S. Supreme Court Hears Argument in Pennsylvania Judicial Bias Case

On February 29, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral argu­ment in Williams v. Pennsylvania, a case chal­leng­ing for­mer Pennsylvania Supreme Court Chief Justice Ronald Castille’s par­tic­i­pa­tion in the state’s appeal of a death penal­ty case involv­ing Terry Williams (pic­tured), whose cap­i­tal pros­e­cu­tion Castille per­son­al­ly autho­rized in his ear­li­er role as Philadelphia District Attorney. A low­er court judge over­turned Williams’ death sen­tence in 2012

Read More

Feb 25, 2016

Ex-Ohio Prison Director Calls the Death Penalty a Failed Public Policy’

Former Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction Director Terry J. Collins (pic­tured) says the death penal­ty is​“a failed pub­lic pol­i­cy” that​“isn’t worth fix­ing.” With 30 years of expe­ri­ence as a war­den, region­al cor­rec­tions direc­tor, assis­tant direc­tor, and then cor­rec­tions direc­tor, Collins par­tic­i­pat­ed in 33 exe­cu­tions. He says,​“With each exe­cu­tion I asked myself: Did the exten­sive process of appeals ensure we got it…

Read More

Feb 24, 2016

Mother of Murder Victim: The Death Penalty Would Inflict Additional Pain on Us”

Duval County, Florida pros­e­cu­tors are seek­ing the death penal­ty for the 2013 mur­der of Shelby Farah (pic­tured), over the objec­tions of Ms. Farah’s fam­i­ly. After unsuc­cess­ful attempts to per­suade pros­e­cu­tors to non-cap­i­­tal­­ly resolve the case, Darlene Farah, Ms. Farah’s moth­er, pub­licly expressed her views in a recent col­umn in TIME. Farah said,​“I do not want my fam­i­ly to go through the years of tri­als and appeals that come with death-penalty…

Read More