Publications & Testimony

Items: 2671 — 2680


Jun 29, 2015

Supreme Court Narrowly Upholds Use of Lethal Injection Drug

On June 29, the U.S. Supreme Court held (5 – 4) in Glossip v. Gross that Oklahoma inmates​“failed to estab­lish a like­li­hood of suc­cess on the mer­its of their claim that the use of mida­zo­lam vio­lates the Eighth Amendment.” Three inmates on Oklahoma’s death row had chal­lenged the state’s use of mida­zo­lam as the first drug in a three-drug pro­to­col, say­ing that it​“fails to ren­der a person…

Read More

Jun 26, 2015

Recent Texas Execution: Did An Innocent Man Fall Through Death Penalty Procedural Cracks?

Lester Bower was exe­cut­ed in Texas on June 3 despite main­tain­ing his inno­cence through­out the 30 years he spent on death row. The evi­dence of Bower’s inno­cence includ­ed tes­ti­mo­ny from a woman who said that her boyfriend and three of his friends — not Bower — had com­mit­ted the mur­ders for which Bower was exe­cut­ed. The wit­ness came for­ward in 1989, after read­ing that Bower had been sen­tenced to death for the crime her boyfriend had…

Read More

Jun 24, 2015

As Court Prepares to Hear Juror Exclusion Case, A Look at Tactics That Exclude Blacks from Juries

This fall, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear a Georgia case, Foster v. Humphrey, in which an all-white jury sen­tenced a black man to death after pros­e­cu­tors struck every black prospec­tive juror in the case. The Court will deter­mine whether pros­e­cu­tors vio­lat­ed the Court’s 1986 deci­sion in Batson v. Kentucky, which banned the prac­tice of dis­miss­ing poten­tial jurors on the basis of race. In antic­i­pa­tion of the case, The New Yorker

Read More

Jun 23, 2015

Editorials in Major Death Penalty States Call for Its Abolition

Recent edi­to­ri­als from lead­ing news­pa­pers in three of the largest death row states cri­tique flaws in the death penal­ty and call for its abo­li­tion. The Sacramento Bee quot­ed fed­er­al dis­trict court judge Cormac Carney’s recent rul­ing find­ing California’s death penal­ty uncon­sti­tu­tion­al because exe­cu­tions are so rare that they​“serve no ret­ribu­tive or deter­rent pur­pose.” The Bee called the state’s capital…

Read More

Jun 18, 2015

Supreme Court Rules in Favor of Intellectually Disabled Louisiana Defendant

CORRECTION: On June 18, the U.S. Supreme Court announced its deci­sion in Brumfield v. Cain, a Louisiana death penal­ty case deal­ing with intel­lec­tu­al dis­abil­i­ty. The Court held that the fed­er­al dis­trict court was enti­tled to con­duct an evi­den­tiary hear­ing to deter­mine whether Kevan Brumfield has intel­lec­tu­al dis­abil­i­ty and is there­fore inel­i­gi­ble for exe­cu­tion. It reversed a rul­ing of the United States Court of Appeals…

Read More

Jun 18, 2015

BRUMFIELD v. CAIN, No. 13 – 1433

The Court grant­ed cer­tio­rari in Brumfield v. Cain, a death penal­ty case from Louisiana deal­ing with intel­lec­tu­al dis­abil­i­ty. Kevan Brumfield was sen­tenced to death pri­or to the Court’s deci­sion in Atkins v. Virginia (2002), which banned the exe­cu­tion of defen­dants with intel­lec­tu­al dis­abil­i­ties. After that rul­ing, Brumfield filed a claim of intel­lec­tu­al dis­abil­i­ty in state court. The court denied him a hear­ing because the tri­al tran­script showed no evidence…

Read More

Jun 17, 2015

Death Row, USA Spring 2015” Illustrates Continuing Decline of Death Penalty

The Spring 2015 update to the NAACP Legal Defense Fund’s pub­li­ca­tion, Death Row, USA, reports that 3,002 men and women were on death rows across the United States as of April 1, 2015. This reflects a con­tin­u­ing decline in the size of death row, down 13% since Spring 2005, when 3,452 peo­ple were on America’s death rows. Several states saw sig­nif­i­cant drops in their death row pop­u­la­tions over that peri­od while car­ry­ing out few or no executions:…

Read More