Publications & Testimony

On June 29, 2015, the U.S. Supreme Court denied Oklahoma pris­on­ers’ lethal injec­tion chal­lenge in Glossip v. Gross. In a sweep­ing dis­sent­ing opin­ion, Justice Stephen Breyer, joined by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, raised seri­ous ques­tions about the admin­is­tra­tion of the death penal­ty. Below are excerpts from the opin­ion with links to the DPIC resources cited…

On June 29, the U.S. Supreme Court held (5 – 4) in Glossip v. Gross that Oklahoma inmates​“failed to estab­lish a like­li­hood of suc­cess on the mer­its of their claim that the use of mida­zo­lam vio­lates the Eighth Amendment.” Three inmates on Oklahoma’s death row had chal­lenged the state’s use of mida­zo­lam as the first drug in a three-drug pro­to­col, say­ing that it​“fails to ren­der a person…

Lester Bower was exe­cut­ed in Texas on June 3 despite main­tain­ing his inno­cence through­out the 30 years he spent on death row. The evi­dence of Bower’s inno­cence includ­ed tes­ti­mo­ny from a woman who said that her boyfriend and three of his friends — not Bower — had com­mit­ted the mur­ders for which Bower was exe­cut­ed. The wit­ness came for­ward in 1989, after read­ing that Bower had been sen­tenced to death for the crime her boyfriend had…

In an inter­view with The Marshall Project, Bryan Stevenson (pic­tured), direc­tor of the Equal Justice Initiative and author of Just Mercy, dis­cussed the role the his­to­ry of slav­ery, lynch­ings, and racial ter­ror­ism in the South played in the racial­­ly-moti­­vat­ed killings of nine black peo­ple in an his­toric black church in Charleston,…

This fall, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear a Georgia case, Foster v. Humphrey, in which an all-white jury sen­tenced a black man to death after pros­e­cu­tors struck every black prospec­tive juror in the case. The Court will deter­mine whether pros­e­cu­tors vio­lat­ed the Court’s 1986 deci­sion in Batson v. Kentucky, which banned the prac­tice of dis­miss­ing poten­tial jurors on the basis of race. In antic­i­pa­tion of the case, The New Yorker…

Recent edi­to­ri­als from lead­ing news­pa­pers in three of the largest death row states cri­tique flaws in the death penal­ty and call for its abo­li­tion. The Sacramento Bee quot­ed fed­er­al dis­trict court judge Cormac Carney’s recent rul­ing find­ing California’s death penal­ty uncon­sti­tu­tion­al because exe­cu­tions are so rare that they​“serve no ret­ribu­tive or deter­rent pur­pose.” The Bee called the state’s capital…

A new study by North Carolina’s Center for Death Penalty Litigation exam­ines the finan­cial and human costs of cas­es in which,​“pros­e­cu­tors sought the death penal­ty despite a clear lack of evi­dence, result­ing in acquittal or…

84 years after Pennsylvania exe­cut­ed a black 16-year-old for the 1931 mur­der of his white school matron, the descen­dants of the boy’s tri­al lawyers are try­ing to exonerate…

CORRECTION: On June 18, the U.S. Supreme Court announced its deci­sion in Brumfield v. Cain, a Louisiana death penal­ty case deal­ing with intel­lec­tu­al dis­abil­i­ty. The Court held that the fed­er­al dis­trict court was enti­tled to con­duct an evi­den­tiary hear­ing to deter­mine whether Kevan Brumfield has intel­lec­tu­al dis­abil­i­ty and is there­fore inel­i­gi­ble for exe­cu­tion. It reversed a rul­ing of the United States Court of Appeals…

The Court grant­ed cer­tio­rari in Brumfield v. Cain, a death penal­ty case from Louisiana deal­ing with intel­lec­tu­al dis­abil­i­ty. Kevan Brumfield was sen­tenced to death pri­or to the Court’s deci­sion in Atkins v. Virginia (2002), which banned the exe­cu­tion of defen­dants with intel­lec­tu­al dis­abil­i­ties. After that rul­ing, Brumfield filed a claim of intel­lec­tu­al dis­abil­i­ty in state court. The court denied him a hear­ing because the tri­al tran­script showed no evidence…