Publications & Testimony

On March 30, the American Pharmacists Association (APhA) adopt­ed a res­o­lu­tion dis­cour­ag­ing phar­ma­cist par­tic­i­pa­tion in exe­cu­tions. The House of Delegates of the 62,000 mem­ber orga­ni­za­tion passed the pol­i­cy, which states,​“The American Pharmacists Association dis­cour­ages phar­ma­cist par­tic­i­pa­tion in exe­cu­tions on the basis that such activ­i­ties are fun­da­men­tal­ly con­trary to the role of phar­ma­cists as providers of health care.” William…

On Monday, March 30, the U.S. Supreme Court grant­ed review of three Kansas death penal­ty cas­es and heard oral argu­ment in a Louisiana case that pre­sent­ed ques­tions on the role of the fed­er­al courts in deter­min­ing whether a state pris­on­er who faces the death penal­ty has intel­lec­tu­al dis­abil­i­ty. In the cas­es of Kansas v. Reginald Carr, Kansas v. Jonathan Carr, and Kansas v.

In a new arti­cle for the University of Chicago Law Review, Professors Carol S. Steiker (left) of the University of Texas School of Law and Jordan M. Steiker (right) of Harvard Law School exam­ine the racial his­to­ry of the American death penal­ty and what they describe as the U.S. Supreme Court’s​“deaf­en­ing silence” on the sub­ject of race and cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment. They assert that the sto­ry of the death penal­ty​“can­not be told with­out detailed atten­tion to race.” The Steikers’…

A recent arti­cle in Mother Jones exam­ines lin­ger­ing ques­tions in the deter­mi­na­tion of which inmates are exempt from exe­cu­tion because of…

According to a new poll by Public Policy Polling, a major­i­ty of Pennsylvanians find some form of a life sen­tence to be prefer­able to the death penal­ty, and more sup­port the death penal­ty mora­to­ri­um imposed by Governor Tom Wolf than oppose it. When asked what sen­tence they pre­ferred for peo­ple con­vict­ed of mur­der, 54% of respon­dents select­ed some form of life sen­tence, while 42% pre­ferred the death penal­ty. 50% were in favor of the…

The International Academy of Compounding Pharmacists (IACP) is one of the pri­ma­ry orga­ni­za­tions con­cerned with com­pound­ing phar­ma­cies, and it stresses ​“patient care” as a pri­ma­ry con­cern. On March 24, 2015, IACP announced a posi­tion dis­cour­ag­ing mem­bers from pro­vid­ing drugs for exe­cu­tions. The Board of Directors said,​“While the phar­ma­cy pro­fes­sion rec­og­nizes an indi­vid­ual practitioner’s right to deter­mine whether to dis­pense a medication…

UPDATE: After Louisiana denied com­pen­sa­tion to Mr. Ford — who is in hos­pice care, dying from Stage 4 can­cer — Stroud gave an inter­view to the Huffington Post in which he says​“death penal­ty pros­e­cu­tions are a badge of show­ing how out-of-touch we are with oth­er civ­i­lized soci­eties.… We can’t trust the gov­ern­ment to fix pot­holes. Why should we believe they can design a death penal­ty sys­tem that’s fair?” PREVIOUSLY: In a let­ter to the Shreveport…

In a let­ter to the President of the International Commission Against the Death Penalty, Pope Francis expressed the Catholic Church’s oppo­si­tion to the death penal­ty, call­ing it​“inad­mis­si­ble, no mat­ter how seri­ous the crime com­mit­ted.” He con­tin­ued,​“It is an offence against the invi­o­la­bil­i­ty of life and the dig­ni­ty of the human per­son, which con­tra­dicts God’s plan for man and soci­ety, and his mer­ci­ful jus­tice, and impedes the penalty from…

Mamie Norwood, whose hus­band, Amos, was killed by Pennsylvania death row pris­on­er Terry Williams (pic­tured), recent­ly wrote a let­ter to two state offi­cials ask­ing them to​“stop try­ing to execute…

Why is Medellin v. Dretke before the…