Publications & Testimony

Testimony and Statements on the Death Penalty

FROM DPIC

For testimony by former Executive Director Robert Dunham and former Executive Director Richard C. Dieter, please visit our page DPIC Testimony.

FROM RELIGIOUS LEADERS AND ORGANIZATIONS

FROM THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY

FROM ADVOCACY GROUPS

FROM JUDGES, LEGISLATORS, AND OTHER ORGANIZATIONS

FROM MURDER VICTIMS’ FAMILY MEMBERS

Items: 3001 — 3010


Jun 25, 2015

Bryan Stevenson Puts the Charleston Massacre and the Use of the Death Penalty in Historical Context

In an interview with The Marshall Project, Bryan Stevenson (pictured), director of the Equal Justice Initiative and author of Just Mercy, discussed the role the history of slavery, lynchings, and racial terrorism in the South played in the racially-motivated killings of nine black people in an historic black church in Charleston, South Carolina. In the interview, Stevenson described the historical use of the death penalty as a tool to reinforce a racially discriminatory social order. This, he…

Read More

Jun 24, 2015

As Court Prepares to Hear Juror Exclusion Case, A Look at Tactics That Exclude Blacks from Juries

This fall, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear a Georgia case, Foster v. Humphrey, in which an all-white jury sentenced a black man to death after prosecutors struck every black prospective juror in the case. The Court will determine whether prosecutors violated the Court’s 1986 decision in Batson v. Kentucky, which banned the practice of dismissing potential jurors on the basis of race. In anticipation of the case, The New Yorker published an analysis of tactics used to evade Batson challenges by…

Read More

Jun 23, 2015

Editorials in Major Death Penalty States Call for Its Abolition

Recent editorials from leading newspapers in three of the largest death row states critique flaws in the death penalty and call for its abolition. The Sacramento Bee quoted federal district court judge Cormac Carney’s recent ruling finding California’s death penalty unconstitutional because executions are so rare that they “serve no retributive or deterrent purpose.” The Bee called the state’s capital punishment system “an abject failure” and said, “[t]he death penalty has not worked, and never…

Read More

Jun 22, 2015

STUDY: “The Hidden Costs of Wrongful Capital Prosecutions in North Carolina”

A new study by North Carolina’s Center for Death Penalty Litigation examines the financial and human costs of cases in which, “prosecutors sought the death penalty despite a clear lack of evidence, resulting in acquittal or dismissal of charges.” The report found 56 such cases in North Carolina since 1989, in which innocent people spent a total of 112 years spent in jail, with $2.4 million spent in defense costs alone in these weak death penalty cases. The authors compare these cases to those…

Read More

Jun 19, 2015

Pardon Sought for Black Teen Executed by Pennsylvania 84 Years Ago

84 years after Pennsylvania executed a black 16-year-old for the 1931 murder of his white school matron, the descendants of the boy’s trial lawyers are trying to exonerate him. Samuel Lemon, the great-grandson of Alexander McClay Williams’ defense attorney, William Ridley (pictured), has researched the case and concluded that Williams was innocent of murdering Vida Robare. He is trying to obtain a posthumous pardon for Williams. Robare had been granted a divorce from her ex-husband — whom…

Read More

Jun 18, 2015

Supreme Court Rules in Favor of Intellectually Disabled Louisiana Defendant

CORRECTION: On June 18, the U.S. Supreme Court announced its decision in Brumfield v. Cain, a Louisiana death penalty case dealing with intellectual disability. The Court held that the federal district court was entitled to conduct an evidentiary hearing to determine whether Kevan Brumfield has intellectual disability and is therefore ineligible for execution. It reversed a ruling of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit that would have deferred to a Lousiana state court…

Read More

Jun 18, 2015

BRUMFIELD v. CAIN, No. 13 – 1433

Petition for a Writ of Certiorari Opinion of U.S. District Judge Finding Mr. Brumfield Intellectually Disabled Opinon of U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Mr. Brumfield’s Opening Brief The State’s Brief in Opposition Mr. Brumfield’s Reply Amicus Brief of Chief Justice Pascal Calogero Summary of the Case The Court granted certiorari in Brumfield v. Cain, a death penalty case from Louisiana dealing with intellectual disability. Kevan Brumfield was sentenced to death prior to the…

Read More

Jun 17, 2015

“Death Row, USA Spring 2015” Illustrates Continuing Decline of Death Penalty

The Spring 2015 update to the NAACP Legal Defense Fund’s publication, Death Row, USA, reports that 3,002 men and women were on death rows across the United States as of April 1, 2015. This reflects a continuing decline in the size of death row, down 13% since Spring 2005, when 3,452 people were on America’s death rows. Several states saw significant drops in their death row populations over that period while carrying out few or no executions: Pennsylvania dropped from 230 to 184 (no…

Read More

Jun 16, 2015

Third Circuit Rebuffs “Concerted Effort” to Exclude Capital Habeas Lawyers from Pennsylvania State Cases

On June 12, a unanimous panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit rebuffed what it described as “a concerted effort” by Pennsylvania prosecutors to bar lawyers from the Philadelphia federal community defender’s capital habeas unit from representing death row inmates in Pennsylvania state-level appeals. The former Chief Justice of the Pennsylvania state courts had sharply critized the unit — which has overturned more than 100 Pennsylvania death sentences — for what he termed its…

Read More

Jun 15, 2015

Texas Disbars Prosecutor for Misconduct in Sending Innocent Man to Death Row

On June 12, the State Bar of Texas disbarred Burleson County District Attorney Charles Sebesta, the prosecutor whose misconduct led to the wrongful conviction of death row exoneree Anthony Graves (pictured, r.). The bar found that Sebesta violated no fewer than five of the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct, including making a false statement to a court, using evidence known to be false, and failing to disclose exculpatory evidence to the defense. In 2006, the U.S. Court of…

Read More