Publications & Testimony

Items: 3211 — 3220


Jun 07, 2013

RECENT LEGISLATION: North Carolina Legislators Vote to Repeal Racial Justice Act

On June 5, leg­is­la­tors in North Carolina vot­ed to repeal the Racial Justice Act, which had allowed death row inmates to chal­lenge their sen­tences using sta­tis­ti­cal evi­dence of racial bias. Since the law took effect in 2009, most of the inmates fac­ing exe­cu­tion in North Carolina appealed their sen­tence under the law. In 2012, Marcus Robinson, who was the first defen­dant to receive a hear­ing under the RJA, was re-sen­­tenced to life without…

Read More

Jun 06, 2013

LETHAL INJECTION: Latest Court Ruling Continues Suspension of Executions in California

On May 30, California’s First District Court of Appeals upheld a Superior Court rul­ing that found the state’s lethal injec­tion pro­to­col invalid because the California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation failed to com­ply with the require­ments of the Administrative Procedures Act. A spokesman for the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation said that no deci­sion has been made on whether the rul­ing will be appealed to the California Supreme Court or if the…

Read More

Jun 05, 2013

LAW REVIEW: Toward a Right to Litigate Ineffective Assistance of Counsel”

In a forth­com­ing arti­cle in the Washington and Lee Law Review, Ty Alper (pic­tured), Clinical Professor of Law at the University of California at Berkeley, exam­ines how recent U.S. Supreme Court deci­sions may affect the abil­i­ty of defen­dants to raise claims of inef­fec­tive assis­tance of coun­sel. Although the right to effec­tive coun­sel is con­sti­tu­tion­al­ly guar­an­teed, most defen­dants, espe­cial­ly those charged with non-cap­i­­tal crimes, do not have…

Read More

Jun 04, 2013

EDITORIALS: Gov. Scott Should Veto Bill that Speed Up Death Penalty Punishments”

A June 3 edi­to­r­i­al in the Sun Sentinel called on Florida Governor Rick Scott (pic­tured) to veto the Timely Justice Act, a bill passed by the leg­is­la­ture ear­li­er this year that would accel­er­ate exe­cu­tions. The bill requires the gov­er­nor to sign a death war­rant with­in 30 days of a Supreme Court review, with an exe­cu­tion to fol­low with­in 180 days. According to the edi­to­r­i­al, flaws in the sys­tem, evi­denced by death row…

Read More

Jun 03, 2013

RECENT LEGISLATION: Maryland Death Penalty Will Not Face Referendum

Maryland​’s death penal­ty repeal leg­is­la­tion will take effect as sched­uled on October 1, 2013 after its oppo­nents were unsuc­cess­ful in secur­ing the num­ber of sig­na­tures required to put the issue on the November 2014 bal­lot. Efforts to put Maryland’s death penal­ty to a statewide vote were led by Baltimore County State’s Attorney Scott D. Shellenberger and a group called MDPetitions​.com. On May 31, the group announced that it only col­lect­ed about 15,000

Read More

May 31, 2013

INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY: Georgia Inmate Appeals Intellectual Disability Claim to U.S. Supreme Court

On May 23, lawyers for Georgia death row inmate Warren Hill (pic­tured) peti­tioned the U.S. Supreme Court to pre­vent his exe­cu­tion, cit­ing strong evi­dence that Hill has an intel­lec­tu­al dis­abil­i­ty. Three men­tal health experts who tes­ti­fied in 2000 that Hill did not have an intel­lec­tu­al dis­abil­i­ty have now changed their mind about the inmate’s men­tal health. According to the peti­tion,​“all sev­en men­tal health experts who have ever…

Read More

May 30, 2013

Supreme Court Ruling Expands Opportunities for Federal Review of Ineffective Assistance Claims

On May 28, 2013, the Court ruled (5 – 4) in Trevino v. Thaler that death row inmates in Texas can raise claims of inef­fec­tive­ness of coun­sel for the first time in fed­er­al court if they did not have a mean­ing­ful chance to raise the claim in state appeals. The Court held that its rul­ing in Martinez v. Ryan (2012), which pro­vid­ed such a right in an Arizona case where state law…

Read More

May 29, 2013

SENTENCING: Foreman in Arias Trial Says Death Sentencing Deliberations are Unfair to Jurors

William Zervakos, jury fore­man for the Jodi Arias tri­al, recent­ly shared the chal­lenges of being a part of a cap­i­tal jury. Zervakos described jury delib­er­a­tions in Arias’s case as a​“bru­tal no-win sit­u­a­tion” that was​“unfair.” He said that the delib­er­a­tions were full of tears as each juror con­sid­ered whether they should sen­tence Jodi Arias to death or life in prison. He said,​“We’re not lawyers. We can’t inter­pret the law. We’re mere…

Read More

May 28, 2013

EDITORIALS: End the Death Penalty in Kansas and Missouri”

The Kansas City Star recent­ly called for an end to the death penal­ty in Kansas and Missouri. The edi­tors wrote,​“The arc of his­to­ry is bend­ing toward jus­tice when it comes to the death penal­ty, and there’s no good rea­son Missouri and Kansas should lag behind and con­tin­ue to be on the wrong side of both his­to­ry and jus­tice.” The high costs of imple­ment­ing cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment and the risks of wrongful executions…

Read More

May 24, 2013

U.S. Court of Appeals Allows Re-Trial of Justin Wolfe Despite State’s Misconduct

On May 22, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit ruled (2 – 1) that the fed­er­al District Court over­stepped its author­i­ty when it barred any fur­ther pros­e­cu­tion of Justin Wolfe. The Circuit Court upheld the low­er court’s order requir­ing Virginia to either retry Wolfe or release him, and it fur­ther held that Virginia failed to com­ply with that order. In 2002, Wolfe was con­vict­ed of con­spir­a­cy and sen­tenced to death…

Read More