Publications & Testimony

Testimony and Statements on the Death Penalty

FROM DPIC

For testimony by former Executive Director Robert Dunham and former Executive Director Richard C. Dieter, please visit our page DPIC Testimony.

FROM RELIGIOUS LEADERS AND ORGANIZATIONS

FROM THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY

FROM ADVOCACY GROUPS

FROM JUDGES, LEGISLATORS, AND OTHER ORGANIZATIONS

FROM MURDER VICTIMS’ FAMILY MEMBERS

Items: 4391 — 4400


Mar 30, 2010

Mental Health Experts Say North Carolina Case Shows Need to Exempt Mentally Ill from Death Penalty

In North Carolina, Kristin Parks of Disability Rights N.C. and John Tote of the Mental Health Association‑N.C. pointed to the case of Abdullah El-Amin Shareef as illustrating the need for a law exempting the mentall ill from the death penalty. A jury recently sentenced Shareef to life in prison without parole in a case where prosecutors had sought the death penalty. In April 2004, Shareef committed a senseless crime that killed one man and injured three others, primarily because his paranoid…

Read More

Mar 29, 2010

NEW VOICES: “Death penalty hurts – not helps – families of murder victims”

Kathleen Garcia, a victims’ advocate and expert on traumatic grief, recently shared her opinions on the death penalty in New Hampshire, a state that is studying the issue through its Commission on Capital Punishment. Garcia, a member of New Jersey’s Death Penalty Study Commission, wrote, “Make no mistake – I am a conservative, a victims’ advocate and a death penalty supporter. But my real life experience has taught me that as long as the death penalty is on the books in any form, it will…

Read More

Mar 26, 2010

Georgia High Court Allows Death Penalty Case to Proceed Despite Lack of Funding

The Georgia Supreme Court ruled on March 25 that the capital prosecution of Jamie Ryan Weis could proceed despite the defendant’s claims that a lack of state funding for capital defense has deprived him of effective representation and a speedy trial. Weis, who was arrested 4 years ago, was first appointed two defense lawyers with death penalty experience but the agency that funds defense lawyers in capital cases could not pay them. They were replaced by salaried public defenders who…

Read More

Mar 25, 2010

FOREIGN NATIONALS: British National Faces Execution in Texas

When citizens of other countries are arrested in the U.S., special notification procedures are required under the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations, a treaty that the U.S. has signed and ratified. These same procedures apply to U.S. citizens arrested in other countries. There are over 130 people on death row in the U.S. from other countries, and many of them were not afforded their notification rights under the Vienna Convention. Linda Carty is a British national on Texas’ death row from…

Read More

Mar 23, 2010

Texas Execution Approaches Without Critical DNA Testing (UPDATE: EXECUTION STAYED BY SUPREME COURT)

Texas is moving closer to carrying out the execution of Henry Skinner on March 24, despite the fact that critical evidence from the crime scene, which could point to a different suspect, has not been subjected to DNA testing . Many of the major state newspapers in Texas have editorialized for a delay to the execution to allow for the DNA testing. On March 22, the Texas Board of Parole and Pardons refused to recommend clemency for Skinner. Attorneys at the Capital Punishment Center at the…

Read More

Mar 22, 2010

Historical North Carolina Exoneration Almost Never Happened

Gregory Taylor recently became the first person exonerated by the North Carolina Innocence Inquiry Commission, the only state-run agency in the country with the power to overturn convictions based on claims of innocence. Taylor had been convicted of the brutal murder of a prostitute, a crime for which he might have been executed in many states. In 1993, prosecutors relied partly on a lab report indicating that blood was found in Taylor’s SUV, which was found parked near the victim’s body. The…

Read More

Mar 19, 2010

Georgia’s Chief Justice Says Budget Cuts Threaten “Basic Constitutional Rights” of Defendants

The Chief Justice of the Georgia Supreme Court recently warned that cuts to the state budget are making it increasingly difficult for courts to carry out their constitutionally mandated duties. Chief Justice Carol Hunstein stated that the court’s backlog has grown as money has dwindled. “The consequences of these cuts … hit everyone, threatening the basic constitutional rights of civil litigants and criminal defendants as core court functions go by the wayside.” Death penalty cases, which are…

Read More

Mar 18, 2010

EDITORIAL: “Death Row’s Elimination Would Save State Money”

A recent editorial in the Spokane (WA) Spokesman-Review called for elimination of the death penalty in light of its high costs and the state’s tight budget. Executions are uncertain and delayed by the necessity of appeals to ensure the constitutionality of the trial. The editorial cited a study by the Washington Bar Association that identified over $600,000 in additional costs for a capital case: “death penalty cases are estimated to generate roughly $470,000 in additional costs to the…

Read More

Mar 17, 2010

NEW RESOURCES: Slide Presentation of Police Chiefs’ Views on the Death Penalty

The results of a poll of police chiefs recently featured in DPIC’s report “Smart on Crime: Reconsidering the Death Penalty in a Time of Economic Crisis” is now available in the form of a slide presentation on the Web, suitable for use in workshops or discussion groups. The poll, commissioned by DPIC and conducted by R.T. Strategies of Washington, DC, surveyed a national sample of 500 randomly selected U.S. police chiefs on questions regarding the death penalty and reducing violent crime.

Read More

Mar 16, 2010

LAW REVIEWS: Challenging the Constitutionality of the Federal Death Penalty

A recent article in the Akron Law Review asks whether the Federal Death Penalty Act (FDPA) is in compliance with the Sixth Amendment’s right to confront witnesses because it allows hearsay evidence in determining whether a defendant is eligible for the death penalty. During a typical criminal trial, the accused has the right to challenge and cross examine the testimony of state witnesses who must appear in person. But in a death penalty case, the FDPA allows statements of witnesses not present…

Read More