Publications & Testimony

Items: 5451 — 5460


May 24, 2005

New Resource: A Look at the Death Penalty in Japan

The May/​June issue of Foreign Policy mag­a­zine includes an arti­cle on the death penal­ty in Japan by Charles Lane, Supreme Court reporter for The Washington Post. Lane notes that Japan’s death penal­ty is shroud­ed in secre­cy and cul­mi­nates in exe­cu­tions out­side of all pub­lic view. He pro­vides read­ers with a rare look inside this sys­tem and com­pares that coun­try’s poli­cies with U.S. prac­tices and inter­na­tion­al trends. The arti­cle,​“A View to a Kill,” notes that although…

Read More

May 23, 2005

Supreme Court Gives President’s Order First Chance to Resolve International Death Penalty Dispute

The Supreme Court today dis­missed as​“improv­i­dent­ly grant­ed” the case of Jose Medellin, a Mexican nation­al on death row in Texas pri­mar­i­ly because President Bush has interevened and ordered state courts to abide by a rul­ing from the International Court of Justice (ICJ). In an unsigned deci­sion, the Justices decid­ed not to review this case as a mat­ter of fed­er­al habeas cor­pus law. They did note, how­ev­er, that once this mat­ter is reviewed in Texas state courts, the U.S.

Read More

May 23, 2005

SCOTUS Declines to Rule on Foreign Nationals’ Rights

SUPREME COURT DECLINES TO RULE ON RIGHTS OF FOREIGN NATIONALS ON DEATH ROW The Supreme Court today dis­missed as​“improv­i­dent­ly grant­ed” the case of Jose Medellin, a Mexican nation­al on death row in Texas. In an unsigned deci­sion, jus­tices dis­missed as pre­ma­ture the case in which Medellin argued that an opin­ion by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) enti­tled him and the 50 Mexican for­eign nation­als on death row in the United States to a hear­ing on whether their rights…

Read More

May 20, 2005

Texas Court Rules That Half of the Defense Team Can Be Asleep

The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has ruled that a man whose attor­ney slept through por­tions of his 1992 death penal­ty tri­al should not get a new tri­al because he had anoth­er less expe­ri­enced attor­ney who remained awake. In its rul­ing, the Court denied George McFarland’s claim of inef­fec­tive­ness of coun­sel and upheld his death sen­tence.​“We con­clude that, although one of his attor­neys slept through por­tions of his tri­al, appli­cant was not deprived of the assistance of…

Read More

May 19, 2005

New Polls on the Death Penalty

The lat­est Gallup Poll found sup­port for the death penal­ty at 74%, a fig­ure equal to the lev­el in 2003 and less than the 80% sup­port reg­is­tered in 1994. The poll found that sup­port for cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment dropped to 56% when respon­dents were giv­en the alter­na­tive sen­tenc­ing option of life with­out parole, less than the 61% sup­port in 1997 with the same ques­tion. The per­cent­age of respon­dents who believe an inno­cent per­son has been exe­cut­ed in recent years has…

Read More

May 18, 2005

NEW VOICES: Notable North Carolinians Call For Moratorium on Executions

A diverse and bipar­ti­san group of more than 150 promi­nent North Carolinians have urged the General Assembly to pass a mea­sure that would halt exe­cu­tions for two years while a study com­mis­sion exam­ines the state’s cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment sys­tem. A let­ter to the state’s top polit­i­cal lead­ers urg­ing pas­sage of the mora­to­ri­um bill was signed by the group, which includ­ed nine for­mer North Carolina Supreme Court Justices, for­mer pros­e­cu­tors, elect­ed offi­cials, religious…

Read More

May 17, 2005

Texas Defender Service Study Contains Blueprint for Reform

A new study from the Texas Defender Service calls for sub­stan­tial changes in the way Texas han­dles cap­i­tal mur­der cas­es. The report rec­om­mends that Texas imple­ment a series of reforms, includ­ing uni­form inves­ti­ga­tion pro­ce­dures, a life-with­­out-parole sen­tenc­ing option, and a statewide pub­lic defend­er’s office. Drawing from rec­om­men­da­tions made by the blue-rib­bon Illinois Commission on Capital Punishment that was estab­lished to address wrong­ful convictions in…

Read More

May 16, 2005

NEW RESOURCE: Research On Victim Impact Statements

A new research paper by Wayne A. Logan of the William Mitchell College of Law exam­ines the con­sti­tu­tion­al, eth­i­cal and legal issues raised by vic­tim impact evi­dence. In his arti­cle,​“Victims, Survivors and the Decisions to Seek and Impose Death,” Logan notes that the U.S. Supreme Court’s land­mark 1991 deci­sion in Payne v. Tennessee opened the door for sur­vivors of mur­der vic­tims to tes­ti­fy about the social, emo­tion­al, and eco­nom­ic loss­es result­ing from the murder of…

Read More

May 11, 2005

Ohio AP Study

THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN LIFE AND DEATH: Comprehensive Ohio Study Concludes That Who Lives and Who Dies Depends On Race, Geography and Plea…

Read More