Publications & Testimony

Testimony and Statements on the Death Penalty

FROM DPIC

For testimony by former Executive Director Robert Dunham and former Executive Director Richard C. Dieter, please visit our page DPIC Testimony.

FROM RELIGIOUS LEADERS AND ORGANIZATIONS

FROM THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY

FROM ADVOCACY GROUPS

FROM JUDGES, LEGISLATORS, AND OTHER ORGANIZATIONS

FROM MURDER VICTIMS’ FAMILY MEMBERS

Items: 5511 — 5520


Apr 03, 2006

Washington Supreme Court Closely Divided on Rationality of State’s Death Penalty

The Washington State Supreme Court recently came within one vote of effectively abolishing the state’s death penalty when it ruled in the case of death row inmate Dayva Cross. Cross is on death row for the murder of his wife and her two teenage daughters. Attorneys for Cross had argued that their client should not be executed because killers who had committed worse crimes had been spared the death penalty. The 2003 case of Green River Killer Gary Ridgway, who received a life sentence in…

Read More

Apr 03, 2006

Former North Carolina Prosecutor Accused of Withholding Evidence in Second Capital Case

Former Union County prosecutor Scott Brewer, who is already under investigation for allegedly obstructing justice in the 1996 death penalty trial of John Gregory Hoffman, has been accused of withholding important evidence in a second capital trial. Attorneys representing Darrell Strickland have asked the North Carolina State Bar to discipline Brewer for improperly withholding three statements made by the victims’ wife, Gail Brown, the only eyewitness to the crime for which their client was…

Read More

Apr 01, 2006

American Judicature Journal

Judicature Journal Examines Impact of Death Penalty on Justice System The March-April 2006 edition of Judicature, the journal of the American Judicature Society, includes a series of articles about the effects of the death penalty on the administration of justice. The following quotations are from these articles: The Shadow of Death: The Effect of Capital Punishment on American Criminal Law and Policy by Carol Steiker and Jordan Steiker, law professors at Harvard and University of Texas…

Read More

Mar 30, 2006

The Impact of the Death Penalty on Jurors

During a recent presentation at Valparaiso University, Sister Helen Prejean (pictured) engaged in a discussion with the school’s pastor, Rev. Joseph Cunningham. Responding to a remark that Prejean had made about defense attorneys only needing to convince one juror to vote against the death penalty, Cunningham told Prejean that he had been foreman of a jury that sentenced a man to death in 1995. He remarked that he is still dealing with the emotional toll of that experience, stating, “I ache…

Read More

Mar 29, 2006

NEW RESOURCES: Michael Meltsner’s “The Making of a Civil Rights Lawyer”

A new book by Michael Meltsner, The Making of a Civil Rights Lawyer, provides a personal history of the civil rights movement from the perspective of an attorney committed to social change. Meltsner’s writings bring to life a seminal period of legal reform in U.S. history. The book discusses famous cases and the turning points in the civil rights and death penalty movements. Stephen Bright of the Southern Center for Human Rights notes, “Michael Meltsner has performed a great public service by…

Read More

Mar 29, 2006

NEW RESOURCES: American Bar Association’s “Achieving Justice: Freeing the Innocent, Convicting the Guilty”

The American Bar Association’s Criminial Justice Section has released a new report on preventing wrongful convictions. The report, Achieving Justice: Freeing the Innocent, Convicting the Guilty, includes commentary and resolutions that addresses topics such as false confessions, eyewitness identification procedures, use of forensic evidence, jailhouse informants, and compensation for the wrongfully convicted. The report is the result of a three-year ABA effort led by an ad hoc group of defense…

Read More

Mar 28, 2006

SENTENCING: American Judicature Society Releases Death Sentence Numbers for 2005

The Capital Case Data Project of the American Judicature Society announced their count of 125 new death sentences in 2005, one less than in 2004. In addition, AJS counted 14 death sentences imposed through new sentence proceedings after appellate reversals. Those sentenced to death included 63 white defendants, 57 black defendants, and 15 Hispanics. The largest number of death sentences were imposed in California (19) and Florida (16). Texas had 14 death sentences, down considerably from 24 in…

Read More

Mar 27, 2006

NEW VOICES: Victims Do Not Necessarily Want Revenge

Victims of violence and terror are not necessarily well served by a system that promises “closure” in the form of the death penalty, according to a recent Washington Post column by Dahlia Lithwick. Among other cases, the author questions the assumptions in the federal government’s case against Zacarias Moussaoui as it relates to the needs of the family members from the September 11th attack: The death penalty trial of Zacarias Moussaoui has been touted by the government as a way to bring…

Read More

Mar 27, 2006

Supreme Court May Be Tied About a Tie in Kansas Death Penalty Law

The U.S. Supreme Court announced on March 24 that it will rehear Kansas v. Marsh. This case involves the constitutionality of Kansas’ death penalty law, which was struck down by the state Supreme Court in 2004. Kansas law required a death sentence if the jury found that there was an equal balance between the aggravating and mitigating factors presented at the sentencing hearing. The U.S. Supreme Court heard arguments earlier in December when Justice O’Connor was still on the Court. Now that she…

Read More

Mar 24, 2006

OPINION POLLS: Majority of New Yorkers Reject the Death Penalty

Most New Yorkers would choose a sentence of life without parole (LWOP) over the death penalty for those convicted of murder. In a recent poll published in Newsday, 53% of N.Y. adults said LWOP is the better penalty, whereas only 38% chose the death penalty, with 9% uncertain. New York’s death penalty was found unconstitutional by the state’s highest court in 2004. The legislature elected not to modify the statute. (Source: Blum and Weprin Associates / Newsday — Methodology: Telephone…

Read More