Publications & Testimony

Testimony and Statements on the Death Penalty

FROM DPIC

For testimony by former Executive Director Robert Dunham and former Executive Director Richard C. Dieter, please visit our page DPIC Testimony.

FROM RELIGIOUS LEADERS AND ORGANIZATIONS

FROM THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY

FROM ADVOCACY GROUPS

FROM JUDGES, LEGISLATORS, AND OTHER ORGANIZATIONS

FROM MURDER VICTIMS’ FAMILY MEMBERS

Items: 5801 — 5810


Mar 31, 2005

Public Opinion Regarding the Juvenile Death Penalty

A series of public opinion polls conducted in the years leading up to the U.S. Supreme Court’s abolition of the juvenile death penalty showed that only about a third of Americans supported the use of capital punishment against those who were younger than 18 years old at the time of their crime. The survey results included the following: A fall 2001 National Opinion Research Center poll found that while 62% of respondents favored the death penalty in general, only 34% supported the execution of…

Read More

Mar 31, 2005

Op-Eds Regarding the Juvenile Death Penalty

Op-Eds are listed in chronological order, with links to the articles below: Julie Baxter, Even teen killers should be allowed to live to regret it, The Coloradoan, July 21, 2004 Vivian Berger, Stop executing minors, National Law Journal, April 26, 2004 Jeffrey P. Brosco, Florida Ought Not Execute Young Offenders, Tampa (FL) Tribune, April 15, 2004 Sheila S. Hopkins, It’s time to put a legal end to juvenile execution, Tallahassee Democrat, April 12, 2004 Rosalynn Carter, No death penalty for…

Read More

Mar 30, 2005

Virginia Study Says Mistaken Eyewitness Identification Is Major Factor In Wrongful Convictions

A two-year study of 11 wrongful conviction cases in Virginia found that mistaken eyewitness identification is the major reason innocent people have been convicted in the state. The report’s recommendations note that Virginia could dramatically reduce the number of wrongful convictions through a series of reforms, such as changing a variety of police procedures, relaxing the state’s 21-day rule to allow evidence of innocence to be considered beyond this time restriction, ensuring that…

Read More

Mar 30, 2005

NEW VOICES: Victims Testify About the Death Penalty

Recently, various victims and relatives of victims have testified before state legislatures concerning the death penalty. In Connecticut, a woman who had been attacked by convicted murderer Michael Ross, testified that she nevertheless opposes his execution. And in North Carolina, the sister of a man who was murdered in 2003 urged state legislators to reconsider the death penalty. Vivian Dobson, who was attacked by Ross in 1983, said that the death penalty re-traumatizes victims’ family…

Read More

Mar 29, 2005

NEW RESOURCE: Book Details Pelke’s Journey To Death Penalty Opponent

Bill Pelke tells of the life-altering transformation that occurred after his 78-year-old grandmother was murdered by four teen-aged girls in his book, Journey of Hope…From Violence to Healing. Though at first he supported the death penalty for 15-year-old Paula Cooper, one of the young girls who had murdered his grandmother in her home for $10 and an old car, he later opposed her execution and successfully fought to have Cooper’s death sentence overturned. The book follows his personal journey…

Read More

Mar 28, 2005

POSSIBLE INNOCENCE: Florida Supreme Court Vacates 1985 Capital Conviction

The Florida Supreme Court has vacated James Floyd’s 1985 conviction and death sentence, ruling that critical evidence was withheld by the prosecution and that the evidence might have been enough to change the verdict at trial. In its 4 – 2 decision, the Court ruled that the prosecutor’s failure to inform Floyd’s defense counsel that an eyewitness had seen two white men entering the victim’s home on the day of the murder and saw them leave in a suspicious manner approximately one hour later…

Read More

Mar 24, 2005

Upcoming Supreme Court Arguments and Recent Decisions in Capital Cases

The Death Penalty Information Center Web site contains summaries of the issues in upcoming Supreme Court arguments related to the death penalty, as well as summaries of recent Supreme Court decisions. Upcoming Arguments March 28, 2005: Medellin v. Dretke — See DPIC’s Summary April 19, 2005: Bradshaw v. Stumpf — See DPIC’s Summary April 26, 2005: Bell v. Thompson — See DPIC’s Summary Recent Decisions Brown v. Payton — See DPIC’s Summary Roper v. Simmons — See DPIC’s Summary See also…

Read More

Mar 24, 2005

NEW RESOURCE: The Lack of Constitutional Protections in Capital Sentencing Proceedings

A recent article in the Western New England Law Review examines ways in which the rules of evidence and procedures at capital sentencing trials are less rigorous than those applied at the guilt-phase of the trial. In capital sentencing hearings, evidence is permitted that would not be admissible to prove guilt. The defendant does not receive traditional trial protections at the sentencing trial. For example, hearsay may be received by the jury during sentencing, but is generally inadmissible at…

Read More

Mar 23, 2005

Oklahoma Judge Finds Foreign National Was Denied Right to Contact Consulate

An Oklahoma County District Judge has determined that Osbaldo Torres, a Mexican foreign national who was once on Oklahoma’s death row, should have been told before his trial that he had a right to contact his home country’s consulate. Judge Twyla Mason Gray also found that Torres had ineffective counsel at his trial. Her findings stem from a December hearing held at the request of the State Court of Criminal Appeals. The appeals court wanted Judge Gray to hear evidence about Torres’…

Read More

Mar 22, 2005

NEW VOICES: U.S. Senator Santorum Rethinking Death Penalty Views

U.S. Senator Rick Santorum, an outspoken conservative Catholic from Pennsylvania, is re-examining his views on capital punishment. In response to the announcement by the U.S. Catholic Conference of Bishops concerning their new Campaign to End the Use of the Death Penalty, Santorum said, ​“I felt very troubled about cases where someone may have been convicted wrongly. DNA evidence definitely should be used when possible. I agree with the pope that in the civilized world … the application of the…

Read More