Publications & Testimony

Testimony and Statements on the Death Penalty

FROM DPIC

For tes­ti­mo­ny by for­mer Executive Director Robert Dunham and for­mer Executive Director Richard C. Dieter, please vis­it our page DPIC Testimony.
 

FROM RELIGIOUS LEADERS AND ORGANIZATIONS

FROM THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY 

FROM ADVOCACY GROUPS

FROM JUDGES, LEGISLATORS, AND OTHER ORGANIZATIONS

FROM MURDER VICTIMSFAMILY MEMBERS

Items: 6321 — 6330


Aug 01, 2001

United States Supreme Court Decisions: 2000 — 2001 Term

In a 7 – 2 vote, the Court re-affirmed that defen­dants fac­ing the death penal­ty have the right to inform jurors when a life sen­tence would include no pos­si­bil­i­ty of parole. The Court found that Wesley A. Shafer’s right to due process was vio­lat­ed when a South Carolina tri­al judge refused to clar­i­fy for jurors that, if they sen­tenced Shafer to life, he would have no pos­si­bil­i­ty of parole. Justice Ginsburg, writ­ing for the major­i­ty, stat­ed that the jury was obviously…

Read More

Jan 01, 2001

DPIC: Illinois Commission on Capital Punishment

The Death Penalty Information Center has assem­bled the fol­low­ing press mate­ri­als and Web links to pro­vide easy access to infor­ma­tion regard­ing the work of the Illinois Commission on Capital Punishment, a blue-rib­bon pan­el that has recent­ly com­plet­ed the nation’s most com­pre­hen­sive state review of the death penal­ty. The Commission’s find­ings and rec­om­men­da­tions will sure­ly cap­ture the atten­tion of law­mak­ers and legal experts through­out the nation who are watching…

Read More

Dec 31, 2000

A State of Denial: Texas Justice and the Death Penalty

The nation is embroiled in a debate over the death penal­ty. Each day brings fresh accounts of racial bias, incom­pe­tent coun­sel, and mis­con­duct com­mit­ted by police offi­cers or pros­e­cu­tors in cap­i­tal cas­es. The pub­lic increas­ing­ly ques­tions whether the ulti­mate penal­ty can be admin­is­tered fair­ly — free from the taint of racism; free from the dis­grace of coun­sel sleep­ing through a clien­t’s tri­al; free from the risk of exe­cut­ing an inno­cent per­son. Support for the…

Read More