Publications & Testimony

Testimony and Statements on the Death Penalty

FROM DPIC

For tes­ti­mo­ny by for­mer Executive Director Robert Dunham and for­mer Executive Director Richard C. Dieter, please vis­it our page DPIC Testimony.
 

FROM RELIGIOUS LEADERS AND ORGANIZATIONS

FROM THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY 

FROM ADVOCACY GROUPS

FROM JUDGES, LEGISLATORS, AND OTHER ORGANIZATIONS

FROM MURDER VICTIMSFAMILY MEMBERS

Items: 6351 — 6360


Aug 01, 1999

United States Supreme Court Decisions: 1998 — 1999 Term

Jones v. U.S., 97 – 9361, The Court, review­ing the sen­tenc­ing pro­vi­sions of the Federal Death Penalty Act of 1994 for the first time, held that jurors in death penal­ty cas­es do not have to be told about the con­se­quences of their fail­ing to agree on whether life or death is the appro­pri­ate sen­tence. The sen­tenc­ing pro­vi­sions of the Federal Death Penalty Act allow for three sen­tenc­ing options: death, life with­out parole and a less­er sen­tence. The Court’s…

Read More

Dec 31, 1998

Summaries of Additional Deterrence Studies

Deterrence & Murder of Police Officers - According to sta­tis­tics from the lat­est FBI Uniform Crime Report, regions of the coun­try that use the death penal­ty the least are the safest for police offi­cers. Police are most in dan­ger in the south, which accounts for 80% of all exe­cu­tions (90% in 2000). From 1989 – 1998, 292 law enforce­ment offi­cers were felo­nious­ly killed in the south, 125 in the…

Read More