Studies

The American Bar Association’s Criminial Justice Section has released a new report on pre­vent­ing wrong­ful con­vic­tions. The report, Achieving Justice: Freeing the Innocent, Convicting the Guilty, includes com­men­tary and res­o­lu­tions that address­es top­ics such as false con­fes­sions, eye­wit­ness iden­ti­fi­ca­tion pro­ce­dures, use of foren­sic evi­dence, jail­house infor­mants, and com­pen­sa­tion for the wrong­ful­ly con­vict­ed. The report is the result of a three-year ABA effort led by an ad hoc group…

The Capital Case Data Project of the American Judicature Society announced their count of 125 new death sen­tences in 2005, one less than in 2004. In addi­tion, AJS count­ed 14 death sen­tences imposed through new sen­tence pro­ceed­ings after appel­late rever­sals. Those sen­tenced to death includ­ed 63 white defen­dants, 57 black defen­dants, and 15 Hispanics. The largest num­ber of death sen­tences were imposed in California (19) and Florida (16). Texas had 14 death sen­tences, down considerably…

A new report issued by Amnesty International exam­ines the issue of men­tal ill­ness and the death penal­ty. The report notes that the U.S. Supreme Court’s deci­sions to halt the exe­cu­tions of juve­nile offend­ers and those with men­tal retar­da­tion left a ques­tion mark over anoth­er cat­e­go­ry of offend­er, the men­tal­ly ill. In the report, Amnesty asks: ​“If the dimin­ished cul­pa­bil­i­ty asso­ci­at­ed with youth and men­tal retar­da­tion ren­der the death penal­ty an exces­sive pun­ish­ment when used against offenders…

The lat­est edi­tion of the NAACP Legal Defense Fund’s Death Row USA shows an 8% decline in the coun­try’s death row pop­u­la­tion dur­ing the past 5 years, down from 3,652 in 2000 to 3,373 at the end of 2005. According to the report, California con­tin­ues to have the nation’s largest death row pop­u­la­tion (649), fol­lowed by Texas (409), Florida (388), Pennsylvania (231), and Ohio…

An arti­cle in the Science sec­tion of the N.Y. Times reports on research con­duct­ed by psy­chol­o­gists at Stanford University on the effects of exe­cu­tions on prison staff. After inter­view­ing near­ly 250 prison staff mem­bers from three states, the researchers con­clud­ed that those who par­tic­i­pate in exe­cu­tion teams exhib­it high lev­els of ​“moral dis­en­gage­ment,” which one of the researchers described as the ​“abil­i­ty to selec­tive­ly engage and dis­en­gage our moral stan­dards.” The study found that the…

The Constitution Project​’s blue-rib­bon Death Penalty Initiative released a new report, ​“Mandatory Justice: The Death Penalty Revisited,” an updat­ed set of guid­ing prin­ci­ples for reform of death penal­ty sys­tems. The group is com­prised of cur­rent and for­mer FBI offi­cials, state attor­neys gen­er­al, reli­gious lead­ers, vic­tims of crime, aca­d­e­mics, legal experts, and com­mu­ni­ty lead­ers. They iden­ti­fied spe­cif­ic improve­ments to address prob­lems such as arbitrariness,…

A new report issued by Amnesty International found that at least 10% of the first 1,000 peo­ple exe­cut­ed in the United States since 1977 were severe­ly men­tall ill. The report not­ed that the National Association of Mental Health esti­mates that between five and 10% of the 3,400 peo­ple on death row around the coun­try are men­tal­ly ill. Amnesty said that states are fail­ing to address seri­ous men­tal health issues before crimes…

A new report by the American Bar Association Death Penalty Moratorium Implementation Project found that Georgia’s death penal­ty fails to meet 43 ABA stan­dards for improv­ing the fair­ness and accu­ra­cy of the death penal­ty. The assess­ment team assem­bled in Georgia by the ABA was so trou­bled by its find­ings that it called for a mora­to­ri­um on not only exe­cu­tions but also the pros­e­cu­tion of death penal­ty cas­es, and urged the state to study prob­lems such as inad­e­quate fund­ing for defense counsel,…

The Georgia Public Defender Standards Council has pub­lished an analy­sis of death penal­ty cas­es in the state dur­ing the past 30 years. The report was writ­ten by Michael Mears, Director of the Council. The review exam­ines the mod­ern his­to­ry of Georgia’s death penal­ty, and pro­vides data sort­ed in a num­ber of ways, includ­ing by coun­ty, cir­cuit, and defen­dant. It also pro­vides the fol­low­ing sum­ma­ry of the dis­po­si­tions of Georgia’s death penal­ty cas­es: DISPOSITION OF GEORGIA DEATH PENALTY CASES…