A recent study con­duct­ed by Professors Glenn Pierce and Michael Radelet pub­lished in the Lousiana Law Review showed that the odds of a death sen­tence in parts of Louisiana were 2.6 times high­er for those charged with killing a white vic­tim than for those charged with killing a black vic­tim. The study exam­ined 191 homi­cides in East Baton Rouge Parish between 1990 and 2008 involv­ing a charge of first-degree mur­der. Even after con­sid­er­ing oth­er vari­ables such as the num­ber of aggra­vat­ing cir­cum­stances, the num­ber of con­cur­rent felonies and the num­ber of homi­cide vic­tims, the odds of a death sen­tence were 97% high­er for those whose vic­tim was white than for those whose vic­tim was black. The authors of the study sug­gest­ed that one rea­son why the victim’s race was an impor­tant fac­tor was because pros­e­cu­tors’ offices, jurors, judges, inves­ti­gat­ing police offi­cers, and oth­ers involved in con­struct­ing a death penal­ty case are (con­scious­ly or uncon­scious­ly) not as out­raged or ener­gized, on aver­age, when a black is mur­dered as when a white is mur­dered.” The authors said death penal­ty cas­es are expen­sive, and choic­es need to be made on how often the death penal­ty can be sought and in which cas­es” and that the social sta­tus of the vic­tim and the fam­i­ly of the vic­tim, includ­ing his or her race, increas­es [a case’s] importance.”

(G. Pierce and M. Radelet, Death Sentencing in East Baton Rouge Parish, 1990 – 2008,” 71 Louisiana Law Review 647, 671 (2011)). See Studies and Race.

Citation Guide