According to a com­pre­hen­sive review of stud­ies on the death penal­ty by Matthew Robinson, Professor of Government and Justice Studies at Appalachian State University, the death penal­ty in North Carolina is expen­sive, racial­ly biased and inef­fec­tive. Prof. Robinson ana­lyzed data from more than 20 death penal­ty stud­ies and found them to be remark­ably con­sis­tent in their con­clu­sions. He said, In the past six years, three states have abol­ished the death penal­ty: Illinois, New Mexico and New Jersey. They did it for the same rea­son. They found racial bias, they found it to be cost­ly, they found it to be inef­fec­tive and a threat to inno­cent peo­ple.” According to Robinson’s review, use of the death penal­ty in North Carolina has been in decline since 2000. The state has not had an exe­cu­tion since 2006. He found no evi­dence that the death penal­ty deters crime, not­ing that the state’s mur­der rate has declined since exe­cu­tions stopped in 2006. He also found evi­dence of racial bias in the state’s death penal­ty sys­tem. Nearly 80% of death sen­tences imposed in North Carolina have been in cas­es where the vic­tim was white, far high­er than the per­cent­age of whites who are gen­er­al­ly vic­tims of murder.

Recently, a bill was filed in the state leg­is­la­ture that would essen­tial­ly repeal the Racial Justice Act in North Carolina. This Act allows a defen­dant fac­ing the death penal­ty to use sta­tis­ti­cal evi­dence – regard­ing either the race of the defen­dant or the race of the vic­tim – to prove that racial bias was a sig­nif­i­cant fac­tor in his sentence.

(M. Hewlett, Death penal­ty inef­fec­tive, too expen­sive, new study says,” Winston-Salem Journal, April 19, 2011). Read more Studies on the death penal­ty. See also Race.

Citation Guide