A new study con­duct­ed by researchers at Duke University found that the racial com­po­si­tion of jury pools has a pro­found effect on the prob­a­bil­i­ty of a black defen­dant being con­vict­ed. According to the study led by Professor Patrick Bayer of Duke, juries formed from all-white jury pools in Florida con­vict­ed black defen­dants 16 per­cent more often than white defen­dants. In cas­es with no black poten­tial jurors in the jury pool, black defen­dants were con­vict­ed 81 per­cent of the time, while white defen­dants were con­vict­ed 66 per­cent of the time. When at least one mem­ber of the jury pool was black, the con­vic­tion rates for white (73%) and black (71%) defen­dants were near­ly iden­ti­cal. Professor Bayer com­ment­ed, I think this is the first strong and con­vinc­ing evi­dence that the racial com­po­si­tion of the jury pool actu­al­ly has a major effect on tri­al out­comes… Simply put, the luck of the draw on the racial com­po­si­tion of the jury pool has a lot to do with whether some­one is con­vict­ed and that rais­es obvi­ous con­cerns about the fair­ness of our crim­i­nal jus­tice sys­tem.” The study exam­ined over 700 non-cap­i­tal felony cas­es in Sarasota and Lake coun­ties in Florida and was pub­lished in the Quarterly Journal of Economics. Watch a video inter­view with Professor Bayer.

(S. Hartsoe, Study: All-White Jury Pools Convict Black Defendants 16 Percent More Often Than Whites,” Duke Today, April 17, 2012; post­ed May 7, 2012; The Impact of Jury Race in Criminal Trials,” senior author Patrick Bayer, Duke University; Shamena Anwar, Carnegie Mellon University; Randi Hjalmarsson, Queen Mary, University of London. Quarterly Journal of Economics, online April 17, 2012, print in May 2012; DOI num­ber 0.1093/QJE/QJS014).

In April in North Carolina, a Superior Court judge issued a rul­ing in the first case under the state’s Racial Justice Act, find­ing evi­dence of inten­tion­al bias by the state in select­ing juries for death penal­ty cas­es. The court held that race was a mate­ri­al­ly, prac­ti­cal­ly and sta­tis­ti­cal­ly sig­nif­i­cant fac­tor in the deci­sion to exer­cise peremp­to­ry chal­lenges dur­ing jury selec­tion by pros­e­cu­tors” at the time of the defen­dan­t’s tri­al. Lawyers had pre­sent­ed find­ings from a study con­duct­ed at Michigan State University that con­clud­ed that qual­i­fied black jurors in North Carolina were struck from juries at more than twice the rate of qual­i­fied white jurors in the state’s 173 cap­i­tal cas­es between 1990 – 2010. The judge said that the dis­par­i­ty was strong enough to sup­port an infer­ence of inten­tion­al dis­crim­i­na­tion.” The defen­dant s death sen­tence was reduced to life with­out parole. See Race. Read more stud­ies on the death penal­ty. Listen to DPIC’s pod­cast on Race.

Citation Guide