A new study pub­lished in the Houston Law Review, Racial Disparities in the Capital of Capital Punishment,” explores the rela­tion­ship of race to death sen­tenc­ing in Harris County (Houston), Texas. In the study, Prof. Scott Phillips of the University of Denver explores pat­terns involv­ing the race of both vic­tims and defen­dants, while con­trol­ling for oth­er vari­ables. Phillips con­cludes death sen­tences were more like­ly to be imposed in cas­es with white vic­tims than in those with black vic­tims, and that death sen­tences were more like­ly to be imposed on black defen­dants than on white defen­dants in the county. 

With respect to the defen­dant bias, which has not appeared in some oth­er race stud­ies, Phillips found The DA pur­sued death against black defen­dants and white defen­dants at the same rate, but con­trol­ling for con­founders revealed the dis­parate treat­ment of black defen­dants. The appar­ent equal treat­ment is mis­lead­ing because black defen­dants com­mit­ted mur­ders that were less seri­ous” along sev­er­al dimen­sions. Despite the fact that the DA was con­sid­er­ably more like­ly to pur­sue death against black defen­dants, juries were slight­ly more like­ly to impose death against white defen­dants. Presumably, the jurors’ behav­ior is a response to the DA’s occa­sion­al over­reach­ing against black defen­dants. The net effect is that juries atten­u­ate, but do not elim­i­nate, dis­par­i­ties between black and white defen­dants that orig­i­nate in the DA’s office.”

(S. Phillips, Racial Disparities in the Capital of Capital Punishment,” 45 Houston Law Review 807 (2008)). See Studies, Law Reviews, and Race.

Citation Guide