The Supreme Court today dis­missed as improv­i­dent­ly grant­ed” the case of Jose Medellin, a Mexican nation­al on death row in Texas pri­mar­i­ly because President Bush has interevened and ordered state courts to abide by a rul­ing from the International Court of Justice (ICJ). In an unsigned deci­sion, the Justices decid­ed not to review this case as a mat­ter of fed­er­al habeas cor­pus law. They did note, how­ev­er, that once this mat­ter is reviewed in Texas state courts, the U.S. Supreme Court would in all like­li­hood have an oppor­tu­ni­ty to review the Texas courts’ treat­ment of the President’s mem­o­ran­dum and [the] Case Concerning Avena and oth­er Mexican Nationals.…” (foot­note 1).

The World Court had deter­mined that the U.S. gov­ern­ment had failed to com­ply with the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations’ require­ment of con­sular access for for­eign­ers arrest­ed in the United States, and it direct­ed that U.S. courts con­sid­er the claims of almost all of the Mexican nation­als on U.S. death rows who had not been afford­ed this pro­tec­tion. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit held that it was pre­clud­ed from giv­ing effect to the ICJ judg­ment by pri­or U.S. Supreme Court prece­dent. After the Supreme Court agreed to hear the case but before oral argu­ments, President Bush issued an Executive Order direct­ing the state courts to give effect to the ICJ rul­ing and con­sid­er the com­plaints of Medellin. Attorneys for Medellin had asked the Court to stay the case until after Medellin had his hear­ing in state court. Attorneys for Texas argued that Medellin’s fed­er­al claim was barred on pro­ce­dur­al grounds and that President Bush does not have the con­sti­tu­tion­al author­i­ty to order Texas courts to com­ply with the inter­na­tion­al court’s judg­ment. In today’s dis­missal, the Court cit­ed the President’s Executive Order as a chief rea­son for not review­ing the case, and reserved the right to hear a future appeal once the case had run its course in state court. 

Justice Ginsburg would have grant­ed Medellin’s request for a stay but con­curred in the dis­missal of the case. Four oth­er Justices (O’Connor, Stevens, Souter and Breyer) dis­sent­ed from the Court’s dis­missal of the case and would have decid­ed whether the Fifth Circuit was cor­rect in hold­ing that there were no debat­able issues for appeal. Justice O’Connor wrote in dis­sent:

In this coun­try, the indi­vid­ual States’ (often con­fessed) non­com­pli­ance with the treaty has been a vex­ing prob­lem. It has three times been the sub­ject of pro­ceed­ings in the International Court of Justice (ICJ). The prob­lem may have con­sid­er­able ram­i­fi­ca­tions, because for­eign nation­als are reg­u­lar­ly sub­ject to state crim­i­nal jus­tice sys­tems. For exam­ple, in 2003, over 56,000 nonci­t­i­zens were held in state pris­ons. Noncitizens account­ed for over 10% of the prison pop­u­la­tions in California, New York, and Arizona.

Noncompliance with our treaty oblig­a­tions is espe­cial­ly wor­ri­some in cap­i­tal cas­es. As of February 2005, 119 nonci­t­i­zens from 31 nations were on state death row. In Avena, the ICJ deter­mined that the United States had breached its oblig­a­tion to inform 51 Mexican nation­als, all sen­tenced to death in this coun­try, of their right to con­sular noti­fi­ca­tion. Medellín is just one of them. His case thus presents, and the Court in turn avoids, ques­tions that will inevitably recur.

(inter­nal cita­tions omit­ted).

See today’s (May 23) opin­ions from the Supreme Court in Medellin: http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/23may20051130/www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/04pdf/04 – 5928.pdf

See also Associated Press, May 23, 2005.

See DPIC’s Questions and Answers on the Medellin case: http://​www​.death​penal​ty​in​fo​.org/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​.​p​h​p​?​&​d​i​d​=1380

See Medellin’s Petition for a Writ of Certiorari; Texas’ Brief in Opposition; Medellin’s Reply; and Amici briefs
https://​www​.debevoise​.com/​n​e​w​s​/​n​e​w​s​d​e​t​a​i​l​.​a​s​p​?​n​e​w​s​i​d​=​1152312142004

See DPIC’s page on Foreign Nationals
http://​www​.death​penal​ty​in​fo​.org/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​.​p​h​p​?​d​i​d​=​198&​s​c​id=31

Citation Guide