Justices John Paul Stevens and Clarence Thomas dis­agreed over whether to grant a stay of exe­cu­tion to Cecil Johnson, Jr., who was was con­vict­ed of mur­der in a 1980 shoot­ing at a con­ve­nience store in Tennessee. Johnson had been on death row for near­ly three decades. Justice Stevens said this lengthy time between his sen­tenc­ing and exe­cu­tion could amount to cru­el and unusu­al pun­ish­ment: “[T]he delay itself sub­jects death row inmates to decades of espe­cial­ly severe, dehu­man­iz­ing con­di­tions of con­fine­ment,” espe­cial­ly when most of the delay was caused by the state. Justice Breyer con­curred with Stevens. Both Justices have long urged their col­leagues to address the issue of the exten­sive time inmates spend on death row.

Justice Thomas react­ed strong­ly to Stevens’s asser­tion, claim­ing that as long as our sys­tem affords cap­i­tal defen­dants the pro­ce­dur­al safe­guards this court has long endorsed, defen­dants who avail them­selves of these pro­ce­dures will face the delays Justice Stevens laments.”

The stay was even­tu­al­ly denied, and around 2:34 am on Dec. 2, Johnson became the 1,185th per­son exe­cut­ed since the death penal­ty was rein­stat­ed in 1976.

(B. Mears, 2 jus­tices spar over Tennessee exe­cu­tion,” CNNInternational​.com, December 2, 2009; Johnson v. Bredesen, No. 09 – 7837 (U.S. Dec. 2, 2009) (Thomas, J., con­cur­ring and Stevens & Breyer, JJ., dis­sent­ing in the denial of a stay of exe­cu­tion). See also Time on Death Row and U.S. Supreme Court.

Citation Guide