Dawn Mancarella, whose moth­er, Joyce Masury, was mur­dered 20 years ago, called the death penal­ty a waste of ener­gy and mon­ey [that] doesn’t bring jus­tice or clo­sure.” Sharing her views on the death penal­ty in a col­umn for Connecticut’s Register Citizen, Mancarella expressed sup­port for the Connecticut Supreme Court’s 2015 deci­sion declar­ing the death penal­ty incom­pat­i­ble with con­tem­po­rary stan­dards of decen­cy in Connecticut.” It’s dis­ap­point­ing to see that the court is re-vis­it­ing this deci­sion,” she wrote, but I hope they will affirm the orig­i­nal deci­sion and leave the death penal­ty behind us.” Mancarella said that the death penal­ty forces vic­tims’ fam­i­ly mem­bers to go through the pain of reliv­ing their loved one’s mur­der over and over again, year after year” through the lengthy appel­late process. This, she says, is the oppo­site of jus­tice and clo­sure — even if the con­vict­ed offend­er is put to death in one, ten or twen­ty years, the anguish of los­ing your loved one nev­er goes away and a state appoint­ed exe­cu­tion doesn’t make you feel any bet­ter.” She con­trasts the ener­gy and mon­ey expend­ed on the death penal­ty with the state’s treat­ment of pro­grams to help vic­tims’ fam­i­lies heal: it is beyond frus­trat­ing to see mil­lions of dol­lars invest­ed into a sin­gle cap­i­tal case,” she says, while vic­tims’ ser­vices are per­pet­u­al­ly under­fund­ed.” She con­cludes, It is time to give back our mis­placed time and ener­gy to the sur­vivors of homi­cide for their heal­ing and tru­ly hon­or­ing their loved one.”

(D. Mancarella, FORUM: Capital pun­ish­ment a waste of ener­gy and mon­ey,” The Register Citizen,” January 21, 2016.) See Victims and New Voices.

Citation Guide