One death row inmate from Oregon and anoth­er from North Carolina recent­ly had their death sen­tences removed because of con­cerns about their men­tal com­pe­ten­cy. In Oregon, Robert James Acremants sen­tence was reduced to life with­out the pos­si­bil­i­ty of parole. Since 2003, prison psy­chi­a­trists have diag­nosed him as men­tal­ly ill, and Acremant said he hears voic­es and has a trans­mit­ter in his head that allows oth­ers to con­trol him. He still has a death sen­tence from a case in California. Isaac Stroud in North Carolina was removed from death row after a judge ruled his men­tal con­di­tion kept him from assist­ing with his own defense. With con­sent from the vic­tim’s fam­i­ly, District Attorney Tracey Cline agreed to a life sen­tence for a 1995 mur­der con­vic­tion and an addi­tion­al 30-year sen­tence for kid­nap­ping. Cline said, It was appar­ent that he did suf­fer from a men­tal health con­di­tion. The [victim’s] fam­i­ly, after so much time, basi­cal­ly just want­ed to be sure that Mr. Stroud was not released from prison dur­ing his life­time.” Stroud’s attor­ney, Marilyn Ozer, said, Everyone looks at the sys­tem dif­fer­ent­ly than they did 20 years ago, so it makes sense to go back and look at these cas­es.” Stroud was not eli­gi­ble for a sen­tence of life with­out parole at the time of his conviction.

In 1986, the U.S. Supreme Court held in Ford v. Wainwright that it would be uncon­sti­tu­tion­al to exe­cute a men­tal­ly incompetent inmate.

(J. Deconto, Durham man will not be exe­cut­ed,” News and Observer, February 19, 2011; Associated Press, Oregon death sen­tence reduced, man delu­sion­al’,” reprint­ed in Mercury News, February 18, 2011). See Mental Illness and Victims.

Citation Guide