Policy

Representation

Defendants are much less likely to be sentenced to death when they are represented by qualified lawyers who are provided sufficient time and resources to present a strong defense.

DPI Podcast: Discussions With DPI

DPI Podcast: Discussions With DPI

Lawyers for the Condemned

ABA Guidelines and Standards for Capital Representation

ABA Guidelines and Standards for Capital Representation

American Bar Association's recommended standards for counsel in capital cases

Overview

The qual­i­ty of rep­re­sen­ta­tion a defen­dant receives in a cap­i­tal case can make the dif­fer­ence between life and death. Almost all defen­dants can­not afford to pay for a lawyer, and states dif­fer wide­ly on the stan­dards — if any — for death penal­ty rep­re­sen­ta­tion. Accounts of lawyers sleep­ing or drink­ing alco­hol dur­ing the tri­al, lawyers with racial bias toward their client, lawyers who con­duct no inves­ti­ga­tion or fail to obtain nec­es­sary experts, or lawyers sim­ply hav­ing no expe­ri­ence with cap­i­tal cas­es have been ram­pant through­out the his­to­ry of the death penalty.

The right to an attor­ney is a hall­mark of the American judi­cial sys­tem. It is essen­tial that the lawyer be expe­ri­enced in cap­i­tal cas­es, be ade­quate­ly com­pen­sat­ed, and have access to the resources need­ed to ful­fill his or her oblig­a­tions to the client and the court.

As abus­es in the sys­tem have been exposed, most states have raised the stan­dards for rep­re­sen­ta­tion. However, most death-penal­ty states do not have statewide cap­i­tal defense orga­ni­za­tions, and many coun­ties who are respon­si­ble for assign­ing and com­pen­sat­ing lawyers have small bud­gets and can­not afford the kind of rep­re­sen­ta­tion a cap­i­tal case requires.

At Issue

Despite the poor qual­i­ty of rep­re­sen­ta­tion in many cap­i­tal cas­es, courts have often upheld the con­vic­tions and death sen­tences imposed because of low expec­ta­tions and the belief that bet­ter rep­re­sen­ta­tion would not have made a dif­fer­ence in the case. Where high­er qual­i­ty coun­sel and ade­quate resources have been pro­vid­ed, death sen­tences have declined dramatically.

What DPIC Offers

DPI has high­light­ed the key court deci­sions in this area, as well as the numer­ous instances in which the sys­tem has failed. A num­ber of DPI’s reports dis­cuss the impor­tance of qual­i­ty rep­re­sen­ta­tion. The stan­dards for rep­re­sen­ta­tion approved by the American Bar Association, along with the sta­tus of state com­pli­ance, are also available.

News & Developments


News

May 20, 2026

130,000 People Urge Clemency for Tony Carruthers in Advance of Tennessee’s Planned Execution

Absent court action, Tony Carruthers is sched­uled to be exe­cut­ed in Tennessee on May 21, 2026, despite untest­ed DNA evi­dence, an inno­cence claim, and seri­ous men­tal ill­ness con­cerns. On May 18, faith lead­ers, civ­il rights advo­cates and com­mu­ni­ty mem­bers marched to the state capi­tol to urge Governor Bill Lee to grant Mr. Carruthers clemen­cy or stay his exe­cu­tion to allow addi­tion­al DNA test­ing, deliv­er­ing a peti­tion with over 130,000 sig­na­tures. Gov. Lee…

Read More

News

May 18, 2026

What to Know: DOJ Seeks to Fast-Track Appeals for Death-Sentenced Prisoners Through Opt-In” Certification Process Without Considering Opposing Views

The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) wants to fast-track death penal­ty appeals and has pro­posed a new set of reg­u­la­tions designed to facil­i­tate that process. If imple­ment­ed, the pro­posed rule would allow the Attorney General to​“cer­ti­fy” active death penal­ty states like Texas, Florida, and Alabama, result­ing in short­er fil­ing dead­lines and restrict­ed fed­er­al court review, among oth­er changes intend­ed to move appeals through the courts more quick­ly. The rule as…

Read More

News

Apr 14, 2026

Tennessee Scheduled to Execute Tony Carruthers Despite Untested DNA Evidence, Innocence Concerns, and Mental Illness

With weeks left before his sched­uled exe­cu­tion on May 21, 2026, coun­sel for Tennessee death-sen­­tenced pris­on­er Tony Carruthers has asked the Tennessee Supreme Court to order DNA test­ing that they argue could prove their client’s inno­cence. On April 9, lawyers from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) filed an emer­gency motion seek­ing DNA test­ing​“on spe­cif­ic pieces of pro­ba­tive phys­i­cal evi­dence, most of which has nev­er been test­ed, and which will like­ly point to…

Read More

News

Feb 24, 2026

Scheduled Execution of Billy Kearse Renews Constitutional Alarms About Pace of Executions in Florida

I am extreme­ly con­cerned by the recent pace of death war­rants and the speed with which the par­ties and involved enti­ties must car­ry out their respec­tive duties.” Florida Supreme Court Justice Jorge Labarga wrote those words in 2023, a year in which Florida con­duct­ed six exe­cu­tions with an aver­age war­rant peri­od of 36 days. Such a pace was already strain­ing the state’s judi­cial, legal, and prison sys­tems. But in 2025, under the sole author­i­ty of Governor Ron DeSantis, the…

Read More

News

Jan 07, 2026

New Report Examines Florida’s Unprecedented Execution Pace and Trends in 2025

The United States car­ried out 47 exe­cu­tions in 2025, and Florida car­ried out 19 — the high­est num­ber in state his­to­ry and more than dou­ble its pre­vi­ous mod­ern record, accord­ing to a year-end report from Floridians for Alternatives to the Death Penalty (FADP). Executions in Florida — which aver­aged one exe­cu­tion every 16 days from February 2025 through December 2025 — account­ed for 40% of the 47 exe­cu­tions nation­wide, mak­ing Florida a clear out­lier in the use of the death…

Read More