On September 26, 2024, a Japanese court for­mal­ly acquit­ted 88-year-old Iwao Hakamada (pic­tured), who was wrong­ful­ly sen­tenced to death in 1968 for the mur­der of his for­mer boss and fam­i­ly in Shizuoka, Japan. After 46 years on death row, and anoth­er decade of lit­i­ga­tion, Judge Kunii Tsuneishi of the Shizuoka District Court ruled that blood-stained cloth­ing used to con­vict Mr. Hakamada was fab­ri­cat­ed long after the mur­ders. The court can­not accept the fact that the blood stain would remain red­dish if it had been soaked in miso for more than a year. The blood­stains were processed and hid­den in the tank by the inves­ti­gat­ing author­i­ties after a con­sid­er­able peri­od of time since the inci­dent,” Judge Tsuneishi said. The judge added that Mr. Hakamada can­not be con­sid­ered the criminal.”

A pro­fes­sion­al box­er as a young adult, Mr. Hakamada retired in 1961 and took a job at a soy­bean pro­cess­ing plant in Shizuoka. In 1966, Mr. Hakamada’s boss and his fam­i­ly were found stabbed to death in their home, and Mr. Hakamada quick­ly became a sus­pect. Enduring lengthy and trou­bling inter­ro­ga­tions, Mr. Hakamada ini­tial­ly admit­ted his involve­ment, but lat­er revoked his con­fes­sion and alleged he was beat­en and tor­tured into con­fess­ing by police. He was sen­tenced to death in a 2 – 1 deci­sion, by a three-judge pan­el, despite his main­te­nance of his inno­cence. In 2014, Mr. Hakamada was grant­ed a retri­al based on DNA test­ing that revealed blood col­lect­ed on a pair of pants revealed no match to Mr. Hakamada or the vic­tims. He was released from prison that same year because of his age and com­pro­mised men­tal state. However, in 2016, Tokyo’s High Court over­turned this deci­sion. Four years lat­er, Japan’s Supreme Court ruled that the High Court must recon­sid­er its deci­sion over­turn­ing Mr. Hakamada’s retri­al. In 2023, the High Court agreed to grant Mr. Hakamada a new tri­al, cit­ing the rul­ing from Japan’s Supreme Court.

Hideko Hakamada, Mr. Hakamada’s 91-year-old sis­ter, was present when Judge Tsuneishi issued his rul­ing and said she couldn’t stop cry­ing and tears were over­flow­ing” when she heard the ver­dict. When the judge said the defen­dant was not guilty, it sound­ed divine to me,” said Ms. Hakamada, who has worked to clear her younger broth­er for decades. Spending near­ly 50 years incar­cer­at­ed in soli­tary con­fine­ment, Mr. Hakamada’s men­tal health has suf­fered great­ly, and accord­ing to his sis­ter, and he now has lim­it­ed capa­bil­i­ty of rec­og­niz­ing real­i­ty. Scientists and med­ical pro­fes­sion­als have long acknowl­edged that pro­longed soli­tary con­fine­ment caus­es seri­ous harm, and accord­ing to the United Nations, can amount to torture.

At a pub­lic event fol­low­ing his for­mal acquit­tal, Mr. Hakamada thanked his sup­port­ers for help­ing him achieve com­plete vic­to­ry.” After spend­ing 46 years in prison, Mr. Hakamada couldn’t wait any longer” for a not guilty ver­dict. He is just the fifth death row pris­on­er in Japan to be grant­ed a retri­al post-WWII, and all those cas­es also end­ed in exonerations.

Although Mr. Hakamada has spent more time on death row in Japan than any oth­er indi­vid­ual in that coun­try, there are sev­er­al peo­ple incar­cer­at­ed on death rows in the U.S. who have been incar­cer­at­ed for as many or more years. In Florida, William Tommy” Zeigler has been on death row since 1976, spend­ing 48 years behind bars for a crime he main­tains he did not com­mit. In October 2022, a Florida cir­cuit court judge indi­cat­ed she would allow DNA test­ing to pro­ceed on more than 100 pre­vi­ous­ly untest­ed pieces of phys­i­cal evi­dence col­lect­ed from the crime scene. Mr. Zeigler first peti­tioned for DNA test­ing in 1994, and test­ing done in 2001 deter­mined por­tions of his cloth­ing did not con­tain the vic­tims’ blood. Additional DNA test­ing request­ed by Mr. Zeigler’s coun­sel was denied in the ear­ly 2000s. Similarly, Henry Sireci, also on Florida’s death row since 1976, has main­tained his inno­cence and was recent­ly allowed to pro­ceed with DNA test­ing in his case. Mr. Sireci was sen­tenced to death for the stab­bing mur­der of an Orlando used car lot own­er in a motel room, and a lab ana­lyst who tes­ti­fied for the pros­e­cu­tion, using dis­cred­it­ed hair sci­ence, said that a hair found at the crime scene was micro­scop­i­cal­ly iden­ti­cal” to Mr. Sireci’s hair. In 2022, the Florida Supreme Court affirmed an agree­ment entered between Mr. Sireci and pros­e­cu­tors to seek addi­tion­al DNA testing.

Both Mr. Zeigler and Mr. Sireci were con­vict­ed and sen­tenced to death in cas­es tried by the same Orange County pros­e­cu­tor and before the same judge. Neither Mr. Zeigler nor Mr. Sireci received a unan­i­mous jury rec­om­men­da­tion for death; and, in Mr. Zeigler’s case, the judge over­rode the jury’s rec­om­men­da­tion of a life sentence.

Citation Guide