Overview
The primary means of execution in the U.S. have been hanging, electrocution, the gas chamber, firing squad, and lethal injection. The Supreme Court has never found a method of execution to be unconstitutional, though some methods have been declared unconstitutional by state courts. The predominance of lethal injection as the preferred means of execution in all states in the modern era may have put off any judgment by the Court regarding older methods.
Because of a resistance by drug manufacturers to provide the drugs typically used in lethal injections, some states now allow the use of alternative methods if lethal injection cannot be performed. Controversies surrounding the method to be used have delayed executions in many states, contributing to an overall decline in the use of the death penalty.
Authorized Methods
NOTE: [Brackets] around a state indicate that the state authorizes the listed method as an alternative method if other methods are found to be unconstitutional or are unavailable/impractical.
| Method | # of executions by method since 1976 | # of states authorizing method | Jurisdictions that Authorize |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lethal Injection | 1470 | 28 states+ and U.S. Military and U.S. Gov’t In South Carolina, lethal injection may be elected as an alternative method, if available. +includes 1 state that no longer have an active death penalty | Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Florida^, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire*, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, [South Carolina], South Dakota, Tennessee^, Texas, Utah, Wyoming, U.S. Military, U.S. Government *New Hampshire abolished the death penalty but the repeal may not apply retroactively, leaving a prisoner on death row facing possible execution. To find the drug protocols used by states, see State-by-State Lethal Injection. |
| Electrocution | 163 | 9 states (in South Carolina, electrocution is the default method; the other 8 have lethal injection as default method). | [Alabama], [Arkansas], Florida, Kentucky, [Louisiana], [Mississippi], [Oklahoma], South Carolina, [Tennessee] The supreme courts of Georgia (2001) and Nebraska (2008) have ruled that the use of the electric chair violates their state constitutional prohibitions against cruel and unusual punishment. Virginia had authorized the electric chair as a method of execution in some cases, but it repealed the death penalty in March 2021. |
| Lethal Gas | 19 | 9 states (all have lethal injection as default method) | [Alabama], Arkansas, Arizona, California, [Louisiana], [Mississippi], Missouri, [Oklahoma], [Wyoming] Five states (Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Oklahoma) specifically authorize execution by nitrogen hypoxia. Alabama and Louisiana have issued a protocol for its use. Alabama and Louisiana are the only states that have performed an execution by nitrogen hypoxia. |
| Firing Squad | 6 | 5 states (in Idaho, firing squad will be the primary method eff. July 2026; in South Carolina, electrocution is the default method; the other states have lethal injection as primary method) | Idaho, [Mississippi], [Oklahoma], [Utah], [South Carolina] |
^Both Florida and Tennessee explicitly authorize lethal injection and electrocution, but state that, if those methods are found unconstitutional, prisoners may be executed by any constitutional method of execution.
News & Developments
News
Feb 04, 2026
Bipartisan Support Defeats Indiana House Bill to Add Firing Squad as Execution Method
A bipartisan group of 19 Republicans and 28 Democrats narrowly defeated a measure to add the firing squad as an execution method in an Indiana House floor vote on January 28, 2026. HB 1119 received 48 in favor and 47 against, falling three votes short of passage, with two legislators not voting and three absent. Although the measure could have been brought for a second vote before February 2, it was not. A similar Senate bill (SB 11) to add the firing squad stalled in…
Read MoreNews
Dec 12, 2025
Should Medical Research Regulations and Informed Consent Principles Apply to States’ Use of Experimental Execution Methods?
New drugs and medical treatments undergo rigorous testing to ensure they are safe and effective for public use. Under federal and state regulations, this testing typically involves clinical trials with human subjects, who face significant health and safety risks as the first people exposed to experimental treatments. That is why the law requires them to be fully informed of the potential effects and give their voluntary consent to participate in…
Read MoreNews
Dec 09, 2025
Roundup of 2025 Legislation to Modify Execution Protocols
On December 15, 2025, the Death Penalty Information Center will release its annual Year End Report detailing nationwide death penalty trends, including executions, new death sentences, legislation, public opinion, and the legal challenges in the Supreme Court. This article highlights the legislation introduced this year to modify execution protocols. This year, legislators in more than half of states that retain the death penalty proposed changes to their…
Read MoreNews
Nov 18, 2025
Facts About the Death Penalty – Is there a “Humane” Execution Method?
Some elected officials and legislators have recently promoted some methods of execution as more“humane” than others. But every execution method ever used has been shown to carry the risk of error and malfunction, with the result that the prisoner may experience pain and suffering as they are executed. Exactly how much pain and suffering the law permits is a constitutional question that has evolved with time and society’s beliefs. Methods once viewed as…
Read MoreNews
Oct 27, 2025
Alabama Execution Witnesses Report “Violent Thrashing” of Prisoner and More Than 225 “Agonized Breaths” in Nitrogen Gas Execution
On October 23, 2025, Alabama executed Anthony Boyd, despite his unwavering claim of innocence and a fiery dissent authored by U.S. Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor, renewing the serious concerns that have been consistently raised about the state’s use of nitrogen gas. Justice Sotomayor, joined by Justices Kagan and Jackson, dissented from the Court’s October 23, 2025, denial of a stay of execution, writing that Alabama’s use of nitrogen gas“violates the Constitution…
Read More
