The Orlando Sentinel in Florida recent­ly called on the state to change the unusu­al way in which it arrives at death sen­tences, rec­om­mend­ing instead unan­i­mous jury deci­sions for a death sen­tence, the pre­vail­ing prac­tice in the vast major­i­ty of states. In June, a fed­er­al judge declared Florida’s death penal­ty uncon­sti­tu­tion­al because it only requires a sim­ple major­i­ty to decide whether aggra­vat­ing fac­tors exist and to rec­om­mend a death sen­tence to the pre­sid­ing judge. In 2005, for­mer Florida Supreme Court Justice Raoul Cantero urged leg­is­la­tors to make a sim­i­lar change and require a unan­i­mous jury rec­om­men­da­tion in cap­i­tal sen­tenc­ing. The fol­low­ing year, a study con­duct­ed by the American Bar Association called for reforms in the state’s death penal­ty sys­tem which has had more exon­er­a­tions than any oth­er state, with 23 inmates released from death row since 1973. The chair of the study, Professor Christopher Slobogin, con­clud­ed, Much more needs to be done to ensure that Florida’s death penal­ty sys­tem avoids exe­cut­ing the inno­cent.” The Sentinels edi­to­r­i­al echoed that con­cern, Florida can no longer shrug off trav­es­ties of jus­tice that damn inno­cents such as Frank Lee Smith. After serv­ing 14 years for a rape and mur­der, DNA test­ing proved his inno­cence. Redemption that came 11 months after he died behind bars. Florida sim­ply can no longer accept a sim­ple major­i­ty when lives hang in the bal­ance.” Read the full editorial below.

United jury need­ed in death penalty cases

In 1981, William Dillon was sen­tenced to life for a Brevard County murder.
Three years lat­er, Anthony Caravella also got life for a rape and mur­der in Miramar.
And in 1996, Chad Heins was sen­tenced to life for the mur­der and attempt­ed rape of his sis­ter-in-law in her Mayport home.
Had the trio received death sen­tences, none like­ly would have lived to see their even­tu­al exon­er­a­tions. Condemned Florida felons spend an aver­age of 12.9 years on death row before exe­cu­tion. Each lan­guished at least 13 years behind bars before post-con­vic­tion DNA test­ing cleared them.
Such trou­bling foul-ups gave birth to the Florida Innocence Commission. It wise­ly reviews wrong­ful con­vic­tion cas­es and gives coun­sel to avoid sim­i­lar blun­ders. Yet, despite the dark cloud shroud­ing the Sunshine State — a U.S.-high 23 inno­cent peo­ple on Florida’s death row have been exon­er­at­ed since exe­cu­tions resumed in 1979 — the state inex­plic­a­bly resists apply­ing sim­i­lar scruti­ny to death penalty cases.
If Florida intends to admin­is­ter the death penal­ty, changes are need­ed. Florida is the only state that juries by sim­ple major­i­ty both decide whether aggra­vat­ing con­di­tions exist and rec­om­mend the death penal­ty. Getting in sync with the oth­er states that require unan­i­mous juries is a ratio­nal first step. It’s a step that state Sen. Thad Altman again is smart­ly cham­pi­oning. Last ses­sion, the Viera Republican’s bill failed even to earn a hearing.
Ignoring calls to review or revamp the way Florida admin­is­ters the death penal­ty has become a legislative tradition.
In 2005, for­mer state Supreme Court Justice Raoul Cantero, in a major­i­ty opin­ion, urged leg­is­la­tors to require in death penal­ty cas­es a unan­i­mous jury rec­om­men­da­tion — not sim­ply a mere majority.
A solu­tion echoed in a 2006 American Bar Association study. As University of Florida law pro­fes­sor Christopher Slobogin, who chaired the study, declared: Much more needs to be done to ensure that Florida’s death penal­ty sys­tem avoids exe­cut­ing the innocent.”
But his admo­ni­tion went unheard. The time’s ripe for law­mak­ers to unstop their ears. In June, a Miami fed­er­al judge declared Florida’s death penal­ty uncon­sti­tu­tion­al because it does­n’t require unanimous juries.
The state should drop its appeal and seize the rea­son­able unanimity standard.
Florida can no longer shrug off trav­es­ties of jus­tice that damn inno­cents such as Frank Lee Smith. After serv­ing 14 years for a rape and mur­der, DNA test­ing proved his inno­cence. Redemption that came 11 months after he died behind bars. Florida sim­ply can no longer accept a sim­ple major­i­ty when lives hang in the balance.
(“United jury need­ed in death penal­ty cas­es,” The Orlando Sentinel, edi­to­r­i­al, November 27, 2011). See Arbitrariness and Innocence. Read more Editorials about the death penalty.

Citation Guide