Sixteen death row inmates have filed a law­suit against the state of Mississippi, claim­ing that their exe­cu­tions should be halt­ed because their state-appoint­ed attor­neys were untrained, inex­pe­ri­enced, and over­whelmed.” Under Mississippi law, the state must pro­vide com­pe­tent and con­sci­en­tious” coun­sel for death row inmates before exe­cu­tion dates can be set. The law suit, filed in Hinds County Chancery Court, claims that the attor­neys appoint­ed through the Office of Capital Post-Conviction Counsel did not meet that cri­te­ria and were over­whelmed with oth­er cas­es. In one exam­ple cit­ed in the law­suit, the Mississippi Supreme Court ordered the office to file a motion for DNA test­ing on behalf of Blayde Grayson, who was sen­tenced to death in 1997, but the office nev­er filed the motion. Two death row inmates who are part of the law­suit are sched­uled to be exe­cut­ed con­sec­u­tive­ly lat­er this month. Gerald Holland, age 72 and the old­est inmate on death row, is sched­uled to be exe­cut­ed on May 20. Paul Everette, age 62, will be exe­cut­ed on May 19. The last back-to-back exe­cu­tions in the state took place in 1961.

An inves­ti­ga­tion in a death penal­ty appeal requires hun­dreds and some­times thou­sands of hours if prop­er­ly per­formed by com­pe­tent and con­sci­en­tious coun­sel, almost always with the assis­tance of inves­ti­ga­tors and experts,” the law­suit says. James Craig, attor­ney for the inmates, said one state-appoint­ed attor­ney years ago was han­dling up to nine
death penal­ty cas­es in the office.

(J. Mitchell, 16 death row inmates sue Miss.,” The Clarion Ledger, May 7, 2010). See also Representation and Arbitrariness.

Citation Guide