Justin D. Levinson and Rachel G. Schaefer recent­ly pub­lished Flawed Framework, Fatal Discretion: Unraveling Implicit Bias in Capital Punishment Decisions. The arti­cle syn­the­sizes mul­ti­ple stud­ies exam­in­ing the role of implic­it bias among key deci­sion­mak­ers with­in the legal sys­tem. The authors use this research as evi­dence of both the his­tor­i­cal and ongo­ing influ­ence of implic­it bias on the admin­is­tra­tion of the death penalty. 

In 2025, 75% of defen­dants against whom state pros­e­cu­tors across death eli­gi­ble states sought death sen­tences were peo­ple of col­or (POC). This dis­pro­por­tion­ate rep­re­sen­ta­tion is con­sis­tent with research, high­light­ed by the authors, demon­strat­ing the role of racial bias in cap­i­tal charges and sen­tenc­ing deci­sions. One notable ref­er­enced study by Jennifer Eberhardt and her col­leagues found that the like­li­hood of a death sen­tence for Black defen­dants increased as their facial fea­tures were per­ceived as more stereo­typ­i­cal­ly Black. Black defen­dants with more stereo­typ­i­cal fea­tures were sig­nif­i­cant­ly more like­ly to be sen­tenced to death than Black defen­dants with less stereo­typ­i­cal fea­tures, high­light­ing how implic­it racial bias influ­ences cap­i­tal trial outcomes. 

Juries his­tor­i­cal­ly play a cen­tral role in the racial­ly dis­parate appli­ca­tion of the death penal­ty. DPI’s 2025 data show that only 48% of new death sen­tences imposed on POC were imposed by unan­i­mous juries. Authors Levinson and Schaefer cite research from Justin Levinson, Robert Smith, and Danielle Young to illus­trate how racial bias oper­ates with­in jury deci­sion-mak­ing. Their study con­clud­ed thatc­i­t­i­zens who would be con­sid­ered death-qual­i­fied jurors held stronger implic­it and explic­it racial bias­es than those who would be exclud­ed because of their oppo­si­tion to the death penalty. 

At the same time, DPI found that more death-eli­gi­ble peo­ple of col­or were sen­tenced to life with­out the pos­si­bil­i­ty of parole (LWOP) than to death in 2025, reflect­ing broad­er shifts in pub­lic atti­tudes toward cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment. Gallup polling shows that sup­port for the death penal­ty has fall­en to its low­est lev­el in more than 50 years, declin­ing from 80% in 1994 to 52% in 2025. A 2020 Gallup poll fur­ther found that non­white respon­dents opposed the death penal­ty by a mar­gin of 51% to 47%. While declin­ing pub­lic sup­port has reduced the num­ber of death sen­tences imposed, racial dis­par­i­ties remain­deeply embed­ded in deci­sions about death eli­gi­bil­i­ty and alter­na­tive pun­ish­ments such as LWOP

Citation Guide