Graphic of George Stinney Jr.

The Death Penalty Information Center’s new report on race and the death penal­ty in South Carolina places the state’s death penal­ty sys­tem in his­tor­i­cal con­text, doc­u­ment­ing how racial and state sanc­tioned vio­lence con­tin­ue to influ­ence the admin­is­tra­tion of the death penal­ty. Examining South Carolina’s History of Racial Violence and Capital Punishment, released May 2026, notes the state’s well-doc­u­­men­t­ed use of state-sanc­­tioned vio­lence that has dis­pro­por­tion­ate­ly affect­ed Black com­mu­ni­ties for more than 150 years. 

These acts of racial ter­ror are not sep­a­rate from for­mal sys­tems of pun­ish­ment Western and Central regions of South Carolina reflect con­ti­nu­ity with the state’s his­to­ry of racial vio­lence. Counties such as Lexington and Greenville, which account for 13 doc­u­ment­ed racial ter­ror lynch­ings, have also imposed 28 death sen­tences on Black defen­dants since 1975

South Carolina par­tic­i­pat­ed in the dis­pro­por­tion­ate cap­i­tal sen­tenc­ing of Black youth. Every juve­nile exe­cut­ed between 1865 and 1972, was Black. DPI has found that in the mod­ern era (since 1976), five peo­plehave been exe­cut­ed in South Carolina for crimes com­mit­ted before the age of 21 — four of those peo­ple (80%) have been Black. One of the affect­ed is Marion Bowman Jr., the fifth per­son under age 21 at the time of the crime to be exe­cut­ed in South Carolina since Roper v. Simmons, the United States Supreme Court deci­sion that pro­hibits the death penal­ty for crim­i­nal defen­dants under 18, was decid­ed in 2005

South Carolina reflects broad­er nation­al pat­terns of pros­e­cu­to­r­i­al and juror mis­con­duct. The report high­lights cas­es of Black cap­i­tal defen­dants who have endured the use of racial epi­thets in court­rooms. It also doc­u­ments the sys­tem­at­ic exclu­sion of Black jurors, result­ing in death sen­tences imposed by all-white juries, and cites research demon­strat­ing sig­nif­i­cant racial dis­par­i­ties in cap­i­tal jury selec­tion across the state. Research by Ann M. Eisenberg, Associate Professor of Law at the University of South Carolina School of Law, found that between 1997 and 2012, Black prospec­tive jurors were exclud­ed for cause at a rate of 56%; asub­stan­tial­ly high­er rate than that for white prospective jurors. 

In an inter­view with The Marshall Project, Bryan Stevenson, direc­tor of the Equal Justice Initiative and author of Just Mercy, dis­cussed the role the his­to­ry of slav­ery, lynch­ings, and racial ter­ror­ in the South played in the racial­­ly-moti­­vat­ed killings of nine black peo­ple in an his­toric black church in Charleston, South Carolina on June 172015

If I were the gov­er­nor of South Carolina, I’d say: We’re going to abol­ish the death penal­ty, because we have a his­to­ry of lynch­ing and ter­ror that has demo­nized and bur­dened peo­ple of col­or in this state since we’ve became a state’.”..

Bryanstevensonatted2012

Justice 360, a South Carolina based orga­ni­za­tion work­ing to reform poli­cies and prac­tices in cap­i­tal and juve­nile life with­out parole pro­ceed­ings, has devel­oped a pro­pos­al for a rem­e­dy in response to the his­tor­i­cal racial vio­lence in the state. The South Carolina Racial Justice Act (SCRJA) would be “…a mod­est but impor­tant step toward rem­e­dy­ing [racial dis­crim­i­na­tion] issues revealed by empirical data”. 

Read the full report HERE

Citation Guide