On April 6, 2023, Oklahoma Attorney General Gentner Drummond asked the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals to vacate Richard Glossip’s con­vic­tion and death sen­tence and to remand the case to the District Court for fur­ther pro­ceed­ings. He cit­ed the U.S. Supreme Court’s admo­ni­tion that the prosecutor’s inter­est is not that it shall win a case, but that jus­tice shall be done.”

Regarding his motion to the court, Drummond said: After thor­ough and seri­ous delib­er­a­tion, I have con­clud­ed that I can­not stand behind the mur­der con­vic­tion and death sen­tence of Richard Glossip. This is not to say I believe he is inno­cent. However, it is crit­i­cal that Oklahomans have absolute faith that the death penal­ty is admin­is­tered fair­ly and with cer­tain­ty. Considering every­thing I know about this case, I do not believe that jus­tice is served by exe­cut­ing a man based on the tes­ti­mo­ny of a compromised witness.”

The state’s action fol­lows the release of the results of an inves­ti­ga­tion into Glossip’s case by inde­pen­dent coun­sel Rex Duncan, who was appoint­ed by Drummond in January. The state’s mur­der case against Glossip was not par­tic­u­lar­ly strong and would have been, in my view, weak­er if full dis­cov­ery had been pro­vid­ed,” con­clud­ed Duncan. Given the pas­sage of 26 years, death of wit­ness­es, destruc­tion and loss of evi­dence, and 2023 evi­den­tiary dis­clo­sures, it is, in my view, less tenable today.”

On death-row for 25 years, Glossip has long main­tained his inno­cence. He has received three reprieves from Governor Kevin Stitt, the lat­est in November 2022, and was the sub­ject of anoth­er inde­pen­dent inves­ti­ga­tioncon­duct­ed by the law firm of Reed Smith, com­mis­sioned by a bipar­ti­san group of 35 state leg­is­la­tors. Glossip’s exe­cu­tion date was most recent­ly post­poned from February 16 to May 18, mark­ing his ninth exe­cu­tion date. Drummond is ask­ing that the lat­est exe­cu­tion date be postponed.

Don Knight, attor­ney for Glossip, told The Intercept that his client was ecsta­t­ic” when hear­ing the news. It was like this moment washed over his face where he rec­og­nized that after all these years and after every­thing he’s been through, he was final­ly get­ting some­one to lis­ten to him,” Knight explained.

If the appel­late court revers­es Glossip’s con­vic­tion, he could be sub­ject to a re-tri­al, which would be his third in this case. Glossip was also part of a chal­lenge brought to the U.S. Supreme Court regard­ing the drugs used in Oklahoma’s lethal injec­tion process. The Court denied this chal­lenge in a 5 – 4 opin­ion in 2015.